Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Saturday April 08 2017, @03:48AM   Printer-friendly
from the thanks-Microsoft dept.

Next week Microsoft will begin the slowish rollout of its big update to Windows 10, the Creators Update.

Right now, it's doing a little damage control, and preempting complaints about privacy, by listing the types of information its operating system will automatically and silently leak from PCs, slabs, and laptops back to Redmond.

When Windows 10 came out, Reg readers were alarmed by the volume of information the software was collecting and sending back to base. Ever since then, Microsoft has been fighting a PR battle to reassure people that such data slurping isn't all bad – it's "just" telemetry and diagnostics and potentially your files.

Now Redmond's had a little rethink for the Creators Update, and decided to come clean on exactly what the software will phone home – even insisting the closed-source operating system will scoop up less surveillance this time.

What makes you think it's your data?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Runaway1956 on Saturday April 08 2017, @01:14PM (5 children)

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Saturday April 08 2017, @01:14PM (#490825) Journal

    Minor nitpick, sorry to be grammar-nazi-like. You meant "Morality is just a majority consensus."

    But, I disagree. There are spiritual leaders and philosophers aplenty who can offer you morals, with no need to refer to some consensus. If morality is just a majority consensus, then mob rule is perfectly fine. Sorry, your moral compass is broken.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by kaszz on Saturday April 08 2017, @03:47PM

    by kaszz (4211) on Saturday April 08 2017, @03:47PM (#490864) Journal

    It's usually only the majority that can enforce any morality actively or passively by letting others do the deeds. So mob rule in the end anyway.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 08 2017, @09:21PM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday April 08 2017, @09:21PM (#490974)
    How do you know it is broken then? If we accept that different personal moralities are all morality there is no way to check which one is correct and therefore "moral" means... what exactly?
    • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Saturday April 08 2017, @11:30PM (2 children)

      by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Saturday April 08 2017, @11:30PM (#491010) Journal

      "If we accept"

      You may accept anything. I will not.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 09 2017, @05:16AM (1 child)

        by Anonymous Coward on Sunday April 09 2017, @05:16AM (#491082)

        Last time I checked you weren't god either.

        • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Sunday April 09 2017, @11:25AM

          by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Sunday April 09 2017, @11:25AM (#491140) Journal

          Nope - no god at all. Just a discerning individual. Obviously, you are incapable of discerning much about morals. As stated above, you have morals, or you are just part of the mob rule.