Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by on Tuesday April 11 2017, @11:48AM   Printer-friendly
from the did-runaway-and-OO-switch-bodies? dept.

Submitted via IRC for Runaway1956

Rightwing computer scientist and hedge fund billionaire Robert Mercer was the top donor to Donald Trump's presidential campaign. He contributed $13.5 million and laid the groundwork for what is now called the Trump Revolution. Mercer also funded Cambridge Analytica (CA), a small data analytics company that specializes in "election management strategies." CA boasts on its website that it has psychological profiles, based on 5,000 separate pieces of data, on 220 million American voters. CA scoops up masses of data from peoples' Facebook profiles and uses artificial intelligence to influence their thinking and manipulate public opinion. They used these skills to exploit America's populist insurgency and tip the election toward Trump.

[...] We enter and participate in this digital world every day, on our laptops and our smartphones. We are living in a new era of propaganda, one we can't see, with the collection and use of our data played back in ways to covertly manipulate us. All this is enabled by technological platforms originally built to bring us together. Welcome to the age of platform capitalism—the new battleground for the future.

Source: http://projectcensored.org/top-trump-donor-big-data-billionaire-helped-tip-election-now-works-reshape-media/

Previously on SoylentNews: Do Advertisers Know You Better Than You Know Yourself?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Flamebait) by Azuma Hazuki on Tuesday April 11 2017, @07:59PM (2 children)

    by Azuma Hazuki (5086) on Tuesday April 11 2017, @07:59PM (#492421) Journal

    Really now? Creo que estás usando este software de traducción de forma incorrecta. Por favor, consulta el manual.

    Yeah, you don't get to drag me down to your level, asshat. Fox is well known to be full of shit. They've done to our parents what our parents worried violent video games would do to us. And you, ironically, are the one doing what you accuse me of here; simply plugging your ears and going "Nuh uhhh, they're WORSE!" without actually doing the research.

    Yes, mainstream news has gone to hell, and no, I don't really trust any of those networks now, but I'd be a hell of a lot more inclined to trust the BBC than Fox and with good reason.

    --
    I am "that girl" your mother warned you about...
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Flamebait=1, Informative=1, Touché=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Flamebait' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 12 2017, @01:28AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 12 2017, @01:28AM (#492569)

    "News" doesn't matter much these days. The conversation is driven by talk radio on one side and late-night comedy on the other.

  • (Score: 2) by linkdude64 on Wednesday April 12 2017, @02:47PM

    by linkdude64 (5482) on Wednesday April 12 2017, @02:47PM (#492782)

    "you don't get to drag me down to your level, asshat."

    If money is speech, and it ABSOLUTELY is when it comes to fucking television broadcasting, all of the other news conglomerates combined have more speech than Fox News does. This is just the economic reality. How that claim could be construed as trying to "bring you down to my level" is beyond me, so please explain your reasoning.

    "simply plugging your ears"

    Where the fuck is your argument, then? Where is your supporting evidence to your claim that ALL OTHER NEWS STATIONS are EQUAL in influence to a SINGLE one of their competitors? Of course there are subtleties, but do you know what supports my claim that they are still ultimately in competition with each other? The fact that clickbait headlines and misrepresentative sound bites are used to garner attention by every one of them. They are in competition with each other bar fucking none, and you are grasping at straws and falling back to ad hominems faster than your terminal velocity would be if you were physically taking such huge leaps in logic.