Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Wednesday April 12 2017, @10:51AM   Printer-friendly
from the fair-play dept.

Hard work is often touted as the key American virtue that leads to success and opportunity. And there's lots of evidence to suggest that workers buy into the belief: For example, a recent study found that Americans work 25 percent more hours than Europeans, and that U.S. workers tend to take fewer vacation days and retire later in life. But for many, simply working hard doesn't actually lead to a better life.

In the past, economists have acknowledged that citing hard work as the path to prosperity is overly simplistic and optimistic. Ultimately, whether hard work alone can lift people into better economic conditions is a more complex question. The formula only works if an individual's efforts are met with opportunities for a better life. According to research, it's getting harder and harder for Americans to move up the income ladder.

A new poll from the Strong, Prosperous and Resilient Communities Challenge (SPARCC), an initiative to bolster local economies, found that Americans are quite skeptical of the narrative connecting wealth with personal agency. SPARCC found that 74 percent of those surveyed believed that most poor people work hard, but aren't able to work their way out of poverty due to the lack of economic opportunities. In the U.S., 19 percent of income inequality is attributed to predetermined circumstances such as a person's race, gender, and parental income. The SPARCC report also points to past research showing that economic mobility and health outcomes are greatly affected by geography as evidence that individual hard work won't ensure success because opportunities aren't evenly distributed.

The hard-work argument also plays into the policy discussion around inequality. As Katharine Bradbury and Robert Triest, both economists at the Federal Reserve Bank of Boston, write:

Increased inequality may result from increased risk taking and entrepreneurship in an environment of rapid technological change, with some entrepreneurs producing better, or just luckier, innovations than others, and reaping greater rewards. It may also result from increased disparities in work effort, with more industrious individuals earning higher incomes as a result of their greater effort. In both these cases, one could argue convincingly that the increase in inequality is justified and that no remedial changes in public policy are needed. On the other hand, if the increase in inequality results mostly from factors largely beyond the ability of individuals to control or counteract, then a strong case can be made for a public policy response.

-- submitted from IRC


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by VLM on Wednesday April 12 2017, @09:25PM (2 children)

    by VLM (445) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday April 12 2017, @09:25PM (#493071)

    I hope you're sterile or profoundly ugly.

    LOL

    I've noticed that people who oppose the right are just not pleasant to be around. Personal attacks, holiness signalling spirals, holier than thou claims of devoutness, the two minutes hate...

    But people that oppose the left are generally pretty good folks. Nice neighbors, easy to get along with, fun to build a civilization with. Much more tolerant, generally.

    Its not just one or two people, the stereotypes seem to ring true in general.

    The kind of people attracted to political wings says a lot about those wings. The "cool kids" were left wing hippies in the 60s, but as the boomer die off the "cool kids" today are of a somewhat different political view...

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by julian on Wednesday April 12 2017, @09:36PM

    by julian (6003) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday April 12 2017, @09:36PM (#493076)

    But people that oppose the left are generally pretty good folks. Nice neighbors, easy to get along with, fun to build a civilization with. Much more tolerant

    Actual Nazis. [npr.org]

  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 12 2017, @10:19PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 12 2017, @10:19PM (#493101)

    dude

    you just described a cocoon or bubble.

    you surround yourself with people like yourself and yeah everything is great.

    then you start spouting ideas that entire other communities don't like and you act like you are the polite person in a sea of anger. you don't see that everyone else is not like you and equate that the fact you get along with like minded folks somehow makes it so that everyone else are noble savages. I am surprised you haven't expressed white mans burden yet.

    no--you are being interpreted as the jerk in the crowd that god sprinkles upon us to make life interesting.

    and yeah. there are jerks in the other crowds. some of them are the ones that you take most offense with. but lots of people would prefer to stay in their communities and ignore you as you ignore them -- except politics get in the way of that.