SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Amazon controls a big chunk of the book distribution business but as this New York Times article indicates they are not a benevolent overlord--using a number of techniques to bully publishers for more favorable terms.
Over the years this has been a constant problem for small, specialty publishing houses (the source of many important books), but now it's also affecting the majors.
From the article:
The retailer appeared to be using three main tactics in its efforts against Hachette, which owns Grand Central Publishing, Orbit and Little, Brown as well as many other imprints.
One is simply warning that books will take a long time to show up. Amazon has been relentlessly expanding its delivery ambitions, and just this week announced Sunday deliveries in 15 more cities, including Austin, Tex., and New Orleans. Its two-day free shipping program has more than 20 million members.
But if a reader wants a Malcolm Gladwell book from Amazon, "Outliers," "The Tipping Point," "Blink" and "What the Dog Saw" were all listed as taking two to three weeks. A Spanish edition from another publisher was available immediately.
Then there is the question of price. "Outliers" was selling Friday for $15.29, a mere 10 percent discount. On Barnes & Noble, the book was $12.74.
With some Hachette authors, Amazon seemed to be discouraging buyers in other ways. On the top of the page for Jeffery Deaver's forthcoming novel "The Skin Collector," Amazon suggested that the prospective customer buy other novels entirely.
"Similar items at a lower price," it said, were novels by Lee Child and John Sandford.
(Score: 4, Interesting) by Thesis on Saturday May 17 2014, @06:51PM
I refuse to login to a site just to read an article. NYT can DIAF.
(Score: 3, Informative) by Appalbarry on Saturday May 17 2014, @07:55PM
I wasn't asked to log in, so YMMV.
(Score: 2) by carguy on Saturday May 17 2014, @08:45PM
OP here -- I didn't have to log in to see the NY Times article either. Does NYT enforce, "you have read too many pages today (this week, etc), now you have to log in"?
(Score: 2) by etherscythe on Saturday May 17 2014, @09:02PM
Nor I (note that I have NotScripts installed, YMMV). Additionally, you may find that doing a Google search for the headline will give you a link which shows the entire article. There's some kind of marketing program at work I'm sure, and I hesitate to recommend a solution that may contribute to lock-in (recall that Google own like 85% of the online advertising market, and deals like this may be part of the reason why), but it is at least an option.
"Fake News: anything reported outside of my own personally chosen echo chamber"
(Score: 2) by tathra on Saturday May 17 2014, @09:24PM
i block all cookies by default, but leave NotScript turned off since it blocks far too much and as far as i can tell there's no way to whitelist sites. turning notscript on sent me again to NYT's login page, but probably because i just clicked the link with it off. i will remember to try that though since we seem to get quite a few links from NYT, and i refuse to view "accept a cookie from NYT" as a valid solution.
(Score: 3, Informative) by Angry Jesus on Saturday May 17 2014, @08:47PM
> I refuse to login to a site just to read an article. NYT can DIAF.
If you use these firefox add-ons to increase your privacy you serendipitously get to bypass a lot of paywalls:
Self-Destructing Cookies [mozilla.org] (so the paywall can't track you across visits)
RefControl [mozilla.org] (tell it to spoof the http-referrer to be google.com so the site thinks you always clicked in from google)