If the Governor signs MD HB177, beekeepers in Maryland will be granted legal permission to shoot black bears if they threaten honey bee colonies, but only if they have contacted the state's Department of Natural Resources to receive an electric fence:
It's a cliché that happens to be true: Bears love honey. And in Maryland, lawmakers have passed a bill making it legal to shoot a black bear if it threatens a beekeeper's hive.
In February, state Del. Mike McKay testified before the Environment and Transportation Committee on behalf of the bill. He wore a vest festooned with the image of Winnie the Pooh. Del. Herb McMillan noted McKay's attire didn't seem to square with his arguments. "I know you came in here talking about Winnie the Pooh, but the gist of the bill is that you can shoot him," McMillan said, according to The Baltimore Sun.
Existing Maryland law requires a person to have a hunting license and a black bear hunting permit in order to hunt black bears in the state. Exempted is "a person who kills or wounds a black bear in defense of his/her own life, the lives of other individuals, or the lives of animals on the individual's property." This week, Maryland's General Assembly passed McKay's bill. So, if the measure is signed by the governor, as of June, the exemption on hunting bears will extend to the owners of honeybee colonies, if the owner has contacted the state's Department of Natural Resources and installed an electric fence to protect the hive. The measure also provides funds to provide electric fences to beekeepers.
(Score: 1) by evil_aaronm on Thursday April 13 2017, @04:24PM (1 child)
Yeah, this won't be abused at all. Like cops with their, "I was afraid for my life, so I shot the black man who was running in the opposite direction," beekeepers, or their hunter buddies, will say, "He was coming after my beehive, which is actually 5 miles from where the bear was shot."
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 13 2017, @07:24PM
From TFS, the existing law exempted:
a person who kills or wounds a black bear in defense of his/her own life, the lives of other individuals, or the lives of animals on the individual's property
Are you telling me these alleged hunters would not lie and say they shot the bear because it was endangering the life of their dog, or if they don't have a dog, of a neighbor's dog who was on their property? (Note "animals on the individual's property", not "animals the individual owns"...) But they will lie and say it was attacking a beehive? Why the difference?