In response to a commercial that hijacks Google Assistant (aka the Google Home device), Google has updated their systems to prevent that single recording from triggering the device:
Burger King made waves today after it released a TV ad that purposely triggered the Google Assistant. The ad ends with a person saying "OK Google, what is the Whopper burger?"'—a statement designed to trigger any Google Assistant devices like Android phones and Google Home to read aloud a description of the hamburger's ingredients. Google apparently wasn't happy with a third-party hijacking its voice command system to advertise fast food, and has issued a server-side update to specifically disable Burger King's recording.
Very related: News Anchor Sets Off Alexa Devices Around San Diego Ordering Unwanted Dollhouses
Neither Amazon's Alexa nor Google Assistant can identify who is speaking to it based on a profile. This functionality could be added in the future with a hardware or cloud update.
(Score: 2) by kaszz on Friday April 14 2017, @01:04AM (9 children)
So saying "OK, Google, say OK Google every hour" and then await the network effect?
Voice virus? who will be first?
Another approach is to make the "OK, Google" or other catchphrase load bad code such that the device make at least two other devices load bad code..
That these spy services lack any voice identification which should be trivial in comparison to transcribing the words in the voice seems incredibly "duh, didn't think of that".
Ultrasonic or microwave interference could be used to make sure only the specific pad, television, laptop etc but not the owner hears these commands or "order gaming rig to xxxx". As of late I have been informed that IoT and network services is a wonder of diligent and security aware framework ;)
Btw, any clever ideas on how to plug microphones in the similar way that a camera can be plugged with a post-it?
(Score: 4, Informative) by captain normal on Friday April 14 2017, @01:43AM
When ever my 'droid phone prompts me to say "ok, Google" I just say Fu*k you google. it then goes away.
Everyone is entitled to his own opinion, but not to his own facts"- --Daniel Patrick Moynihan--
(Score: 2) by bob_super on Friday April 14 2017, @01:47AM
I'd be surprised if they didn't have voice recognition internally, to better track which people said what when they build ad profiles.
But turning it on for the customers could result in frustrations and missed sales. It's much easier to deal with the returns.
Thick tape or play-doh will take care of the direct sound to a microphone, but not whatever bounces around the case first.
Patent Pending: A rubber phone case which fully encloses the phone, with quick-open capability when you legitimately want to be heard.
(Score: 2) by fido_dogstoyevsky on Friday April 14 2017, @02:25AM (1 child)
...That these spy services lack any voice identification which should be trivial in comparison to transcribing the words in the voice...
I admire your confidence.
It's NOT a conspiracy... it's a plot.
(Score: 2) by kaszz on Friday April 14 2017, @02:52AM
Users lack any two-way connection with them at least :p
(Score: 2) by TheGratefulNet on Friday April 14 2017, @02:58AM (1 child)
hey, are you trying to trigger an 'infinity of (don't do) evil' ??
"It is now safe to switch off your computer."
(Score: 3, Funny) by kaszz on Friday April 14 2017, @03:14AM
I'll do no evil.... Unless there's some fun to be had at the expense of privacy disrespecting corporations :P
OK, Google say OK Google..
OK, Google say OK Google. OK, Google say OK Google..
OK, Google say OK Google. OK, Google say OK Google. OK, Google say OK Google..
OK, Google say OK Google. OK, Google say OK Google. OK, Google say OK Google. OK, Google say OK Google..
Ooopps, sorry! ;-)
(Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 14 2017, @08:18AM (1 child)
"As of late I have been informed that IoT and network services is a wonder of diligent and security aware framework ;)"
I would just like to reiterate that the "S" in IoT stands for "Security".
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday April 14 2017, @11:15AM
It's a funny quip but we don't reiterate here. Let me say that again...
(Score: 2) by tangomargarine on Friday April 14 2017, @03:08PM
That these spy services lack any voice identification which should be trivial in comparison to transcribing the words in the voice
That's pretty damn presumptuous. Any halfway-complex software product is never going to be as easy to write as it looks, never mind voice recognition.
"Is that really true?" "I just spent the last hour telling you to think for yourself! Didn't you hear anything I said?"