Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Monday April 17 2017, @08:18AM   Printer-friendly
from the puff-puff-pass dept.

The CBC reports that Canada's ruling Liberal Party has proposed legislation concerning the use of cannabis:

The pot plan comes with two new bills; one to regulate the recreational use, sale and cultivation of marijuana, and a second that strengthens measures to stop impaired driving.

It would allow people to possess up to 30 grams of dried or fresh cannabis and sets the minimum at 18 years of age, though provinces and territories can set a higher legal age.

Consumers can grow up to four plants at home or buy from a licensed retailer.

[...] buying, selling or using marijuana outside the regulatory regime will remain a serious criminal offence with stiff penalties.

Another CBC article describes the bill on impaired driving. Police could ask drivers for samples of saliva or blood; there are also

[...] provisions that will allow for mandatory roadside alcohol screening and new criminal offences for driving while high.

[...] A driver who is found to have two nanograms but less than five nanograms of THC per millilitre of blood could face a maximum fine of up to $1,000[.]

Additional coverage:
Toronto Star (editorial)


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 17 2017, @12:53PM (4 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 17 2017, @12:53PM (#495222)

    "It would allow people to possess up to 30 grams of dried or fresh cannabis"

    But what about not-so-fresh, but not dried cannabis? Does that mean that wilted or "just resting" cannabis is illegal?

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 1) by Scruffy Beard 2 on Monday April 17 2017, @02:28PM

    by Scruffy Beard 2 (6030) on Monday April 17 2017, @02:28PM (#495261)

    Maybe you have to dry it to find out if you are over the limit :)

  • (Score: 2) by Osamabobama on Monday April 17 2017, @06:18PM (2 children)

    by Osamabobama (5842) on Monday April 17 2017, @06:18PM (#495402)

    My reading would suggest that pickled, fermented, cooked, or rehydrated cannabis is subject to a different limit, perhaps covered by some other statute.

    I'd like to make a joke about 'baked' cannabis, but it seems that there is a real question to be asked about possession limits on baked goods containing cannabis.

    --
    Appended to the end of comments you post. Max: 120 chars.
    • (Score: 2) by NotSanguine on Monday April 17 2017, @08:24PM

      My reading would suggest that pickled, fermented, cooked, or rehydrated cannabis is subject to a different limit, perhaps covered by some other statute.

      My thought was that concentrates [leafly.com] like kief [wikipedia.org] hashish [wikipedia.org] and/or any of a bunch of different kinds of hash oil [wikipedia.org] would be covered differently than the buds and flowering tops.

      --
      No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
    • (Score: 3, Interesting) by dry on Tuesday April 18 2017, @04:21AM

      by dry (223) on Tuesday April 18 2017, @04:21AM (#495674) Journal

      There is supposed to be a follow up law on edibles, probably including a ban on anything that looks too tempting to a kid.
      Currently here in BC where pot is almost defacto legal, the local governments look down heavily on stores selling baked goods on the theory that they're more inviting to kids. Strange in a way as the argument is always made that smoking anything is bad for you, so eating should be encouraged.