Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Monday April 17 2017, @10:24AM   Printer-friendly
from the not-listening-to-all-sides dept.

Submitted via IRC for TheMightyBuzzard

An editorial in the Wellesley College student newspaper that called for "shutting down" some forms of hateful rhetoric became the latest flashpoint in a contentious national debate over free speech and its limits on college campuses.

The editorial, published Wednesday in the Wellesley News, argues that the campus community will "not stand for hate speech, and will call it out when possible."

"Shutting down rhetoric that undermines the existence and rights of others is not a violation of free speech; it is hate speech," the editorial states. "The spirit of free speech is to protect the suppressed, not to protect a free-for-all where anything is acceptable, no matter how hateful and damaging."

The editorial was widely criticized on social media as antithetical to the free exchange of ideas that is critical in a democracy and in liberal arts education. It comes as colleges across the country are wrestling with how to protect free speech in an era of trigger warnings, safe spaces, and even assaults on incendiary speakers invited to campuses.

Free speech for all. Unless they disagree with us on something...

Source: https://www.bostonglobe.com/metro/2017/04/14/wellesley-college-student-newspaper-ignites-free-speech-debate/NHVrp8nNensXxCQHaPLHPJ/story.html


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 17 2017, @03:02PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 17 2017, @03:02PM (#495272)

    - not actively supporting it
    - calling it out when seing it
    - writing strongly worded letters against it
    - motivate students to publicly oppose it

    But that's censorship to Republican snowflakes, especially if somebody calls them "racist" while doing so. Saying "racist" to a Republican is like saying "nigger" to a black person. They'd need to go to their safe space where there are videos of Sean Hannity playing and copies of Breitbart articles.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +4  
       Troll=2, Insightful=5, Funny=1, Total=8
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   4  
  • (Score: 3, Disagree) by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 17 2017, @04:05PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday April 17 2017, @04:05PM (#495301)

    "Shutting down rhetoric that undermines the existence and rights of others is not a violation of free speech" is nothing but lies. Unless you threaten someone, nothing you say undermines their rights; and nothing you say can undermine their existence unless you're some kind of wizard. Banning speech is violating free speech you lying cunt. Be honest for once. You want other people to have as much free speech as the average North Korean.