A vacuum airship made of a homogenous material cannot withstand the atmospheric pressure on Earth for any material humans have yet discovered, which can be proven using the critical buckling load of a sphere. However, from an initial analysis of the vacuum airship structure and relationship to atmospheric conditions, Mars appears to have an atmosphere in which the operation of a vacuum airship would not only be possible, but beneficial over a conventional balloon or dirigible. In addition, a multi-layer approach, in conjunction with a lattice, would circumvent the buckling problems of a single homogenous shell. The lattice used to support the two layers of the vacuum airship shell can be made, using modulation of the lengths of the members, to fit the curvature of the vacuum airship precisely by following an atlas approach to the modulation.
The Martian atmosphere has a pressure to density ratio that is very beneficial to the operation of a vacuum airship; this is a result of the high average molecular weight of the atmosphere (relative to other planets in the solar system) and the temperature of the atmosphere, the trend for which can be observed from the ideal gas law. Through a more in-depth analysis of the vacuum airship model, it can be shown that the vacuum airship may theoretically carry more than twice as much payload as a modeled dirigible of the same size, a 40-meter radius, in the Martian atmosphere.
NASA Innovative Advanced Concepts (NIAC) Program. NBF.
(Score: 2) by PinkyGigglebrain on Wednesday April 19 2017, @07:28AM (1 child)
Wind on Mars is not really that powerful, the atmosphere is too thin to really do much but move the really fine particles of dirt around.
None of the Mars rovers would be able to handle a really windy day on Earth but they have no trouble with the sand storms on Mars.
(That was one of my few criticisms of "The Martian", A sand storm would not have been enough of a threat to the crew to abort the mission.)
"Beware those who would deny you Knowledge, For in their hearts they dream themselves your Master."
(Score: 2) by AndyTheAbsurd on Wednesday April 19 2017, @02:54PM
The author of "The Martian" was actually aware of this - but left it in, because without a reason for the other astronauts to abandon Watney, there was no story. (I learned this from the interview he did with the StarShipSofa podcast [starshipsofa.com]. IIRC, there were a few other scientific inaccuracies as well, but this was the most glaring.)
Please note my username before responding. You may have been trolled.