Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

Fedora Changing its Project Mission

posted by on Wednesday April 19 2017, @07:39AM   Printer-friendly
from the Free-as-in-TANSTAAFL dept.

An Anonymous Coward writes:

Fedora is drafting a new mission statement. The new initial proposal:

Fedora creates an innovative platform that lights up hardware, clouds, and containers for software developers and community members to build tailored solutions for their users.

The original goal was:

to work with the Linux community to build a complete, general purpose operating system exclusively from open source software.

Is saying open, or free, openly (excuse the pun) becoming something to be ashamed of? Are project ditching their ideals? Fedora barely mentioned free (or Free, to be more clear), but now it's even more vague. It's like if had to be reminded over and over to those in charge, as the triggered thread demostrates.

Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Fedora Changing its Project Mission | Log In/Create an Account | Top | 80 comments | Search Discussion
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.

  • (Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 19 2017, @08:26AM (5 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 19 2017, @08:26AM (#496195)

    Fedora has changed focus from free software to hosted cloud platforms, because Fedora failed. There's no money in free software. Free software is not a business model.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   -1  
       Flamebait=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Flamebait' Modifier   0  
    Total Score:   -1  

  • (Score: 1, Informative) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 19 2017, @08:40AM (4 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 19 2017, @08:40AM (#496198)

    Redhat is the enterprise edition, Fedora is the non profit community edition. Since you can't even figure out some of the most basic stuff it is obvious you're trolling for a soapbox to push your own ideologies. Like those door to door Mormons spreading the "good word."

    Now it does seem like fedora might be pushing for a more standard business model but I didn't see much talk about specific monetization.

    • (Score: 2) by epitaxial on Wednesday April 19 2017, @12:52PM (3 children)

      by epitaxial (3165) on Wednesday April 19 2017, @12:52PM (#496264)

      Speaking of Redhat. How do you sell Linux and license it? If you bought Redhat in the past it entitled you to support. Now you are given a license key. If the source is made available what is stopping someone from releasing a "free" Redhat distro with the license key stripped out?

      • (Score: 2) by SDRefugee on Wednesday April 19 2017, @01:10PM

        by SDRefugee (4477) on Wednesday April 19 2017, @01:10PM (#496273)

        Ummm CentOS???

        --
        America should be proud of Edward Snowden, the hero, whether they know it or not..

      • (Score: 4, Informative) by termigator on Wednesday April 19 2017, @01:57PM

        by termigator (4271) on Wednesday April 19 2017, @01:57PM (#496298)

        Nothing, hence the existence of CentOS.

        Interestingly, CentOS is now part of Redhat.

      • (Score: 3, Insightful) by HiThere on Wednesday April 19 2017, @05:28PM

        by HiThere (866) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday April 19 2017, @05:28PM (#496434) Journal

        The thing stopping people is that it's a lot of work. A few people and groups have done this. Several have mentioned CentOS, but there also is (or was, I don't keep current) WhiteBox Linux, and Scientific Linux. There have been others in the past, like KRUD Linux and Pink Tie Linux, and there may be others currently that I just haven't noticed.

        --
        Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.