Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Wednesday April 26 2017, @05:51AM   Printer-friendly
from the you-don't-mess-around-with-Tim dept.

Travis Kalanick, the chief executive of Uber, visited Apple's headquarters in early 2015 to meet with Timothy D. Cook, who runs the iPhone maker. It was a session that Mr. Kalanick was dreading.

For months, Mr. Kalanick had pulled a fast one on Apple by directing his employees to help camouflage the ride-hailing app from Apple's engineers. The reason? So Apple would not find out that Uber had been secretly identifying and tagging iPhones even after its app had been deleted and the devices erased — a fraud detection maneuver that violated Apple's privacy guidelines.

[...] "So, I've heard you've been breaking some of our rules," Mr. Cook said in his calm, Southern tone. Stop the trickery, Mr. Cook then demanded, or Uber's app would be kicked out of Apple's App Store.

There is brazen, and then there is dumb.

If NYTimes is paywalled, try this, Business Insider


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by ledow on Wednesday April 26 2017, @07:14AM (3 children)

    by ledow (5567) on Wednesday April 26 2017, @07:14AM (#499881) Homepage

    You'd have thunk that all their App Store vetting policies would have caught that.

    Or does it have nothing to do with the App Store at all, because the app is gone and the device reset? And hence, none of their business anyway?

    Or do Apple just rely on people noticing that apps are doing creepy things and tracking their users, rather than actually finding out for themselves before they allow them on the app store?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by MostCynical on Wednesday April 26 2017, @08:25AM

    by MostCynical (2589) on Wednesday April 26 2017, @08:25AM (#499901) Journal

    Vetting:
    Is it rude?
    Will any faith-based types complain about it?
    Does it try to bypass the payments system?
    Does it do anything obviously criminal?

    Then, when someone complains, yank it, and tell everyone the problem wasn't related to the app or the vetting, but "something else".

    --
    "I guess once you start doubting, there's no end to it." -Batou, Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Complex
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 26 2017, @10:59AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday April 26 2017, @10:59AM (#499930)

    If Uber was big enough, it could do practically anything, including murdering people during the day and Apple would not even mention that. The world has been corrupted by those with absolute power, and they are not Fascists. Its good that Uber does not have to be around for very long and that it does not provide value others can't.

    • (Score: 3, Insightful) by art guerrilla on Wednesday April 26 2017, @11:57AM

      by art guerrilla (3082) on Wednesday April 26 2017, @11:57AM (#499952)

      when 'we' as a society value profit uber alles, then what will be the end result ? ? ?
      99% of the people are worthless, and zillionaires are the best and most deserving on the planet...
      um, given the premise of profit uber alles, *what* other possible outcome can you expect ? ? ?