Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Thursday April 27 2017, @12:20AM   Printer-friendly
from the is-that-a-railgun-or-are-you-just-happy-to-see-me? dept.

The Motley Fool's Rich Smith writes:

For more than three years now, I've been tracking the U.S. Navy's progress toward building a working electromagnetic railgun prototype — a Mach 6 cannon reputedly capable of striking targets 110 miles away with pinpoint accuracy.

Each railgun projectile would cost about $25,000 to produce — and if you're keeping track, then yes, success on the railgun project would yield a weapon boasting nearly twice the 67-mile range of Boeing's (NYSE:BA) Harpoon II missile but costing just 1/48th the Boeing missile's $1.2 million cost.

https://www.fool.com/investing/2017/04/22/navys-new-mach-6-em-railgun-almost-ready-for-prime.aspx

Electromagnetic Railgun - First shot at Dahlgren's new Terminal Range https://youtu.be/Pi-BDIu_umo


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Insightful) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 27 2017, @08:27AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday April 27 2017, @08:27AM (#500573)

    I guess that depends on your target. I guess if you target a closed structure, there's value in first breaking through the wall, and then exploding inside, in order to destroy as much as possible there. If exploding outside, the structure will provide protection; if exploding inside, the structure will instead prevent the destructive energy go wasted outside.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Thursday April 27 2017, @02:37PM

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Thursday April 27 2017, @02:37PM (#500699) Journal

    You have nailed the definition of "armor piercing" precisely. When a tank is hit with an armor piercing charge, the projectile doesn't enter into the tank at all. Instead, the projectile sets off the internal shaped charge, which is very precisely aimed at a point maybe half as big around as a pencil. The plasma created in that shaped charge burns through, and enters the tank, then ricochets around inside of the steel hull. Anything the plasma touches is toast, whether it be electronics, ammunition, the tank commander, the tank driver, or the pinup taped beside the gunsights.

    Most definitely, often times, you want to deliver your destructive energy INSIDE of a target.