Leprosy is bacterial. In addition to curing leprosy with antibiotics, we also have anti-biotic resistant leprosy. What prevents a terrorist from deliberately infecting themself with leprosy and then engaging in promiscuous activity? How would a city like San Francisco, Washington DC, Paris or Berlin react to leprosy? When leprosy has a long incubation period, are we certain that leprosy isn't spreading already?
martyb: I was debating whether or not to run this story; from the Wikipedia page, "Contrary to popular belief, it is not highly contagious." But, there is more to this than just antibiotic-resistant leprosy. It invites discussion as to other agents with delayed response that could be employed. In addition, given a terrorist's intention to affect some other group, what options do they have which would affect that group without also adversely affecting their own group? How many of their own group are people willing to "harm" in the pursuit of harm to another group?
takyon: Bill Gates: Bioterrorism could kill more than nuclear war — but no one is ready to deal with it
Dept. of Defense aims countermeasures at WMD, synthetic biological threats
Bill Gates: Bioterrorism Weapons Could Kill 30 Million
Vaccine Development Agreements Target Encephalitis Bioterror Agent
Public Meeting on Biodefense Budget Reform
How the House health care bill undercuts bioterror and pandemic defenses
Bengaluru: Wipro gets email threat 'pay 500 cr in bitcoins or suffer bio-terror'; warned of attack by May 25
(Score: 2) by Bot on Sunday May 07 2017, @09:47AM
Terror is effective when you already have power, and counterproductive when you want to acquire it, so I am a bit skeptical of the official narrative around terrorist acts. I think "The Network", 1976 is nearer to the truth.
Account abandoned.