Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Sunday May 07 2017, @03:47PM   Printer-friendly
from the two-hour-sprint dept.

We've previously discussed the possibility of running a two hour marathon (with much of the usual wit in this thread). For a comparison against running one mile in four minutes, running at the pace of a five minute mile would be too slow. Like running a mile in four minutes, people said running a marathon in two hours was impossible. However, it is looking very possible with advanced footwear and suchlike. Specifically, Kenyan marathon runner Eliud Kipchoge was within 0.4% of this goal. Variously reported as being 25 seconds or 26 second too slow, his effort is an unofficial world record.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 07 2017, @04:58PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday May 07 2017, @04:58PM (#505902)

    I think You miss the point. The technological advancement is great -- but world records in sports should not be a measure of technological advancement, but a measure of physical effectiveness. If we drape swimmers in dolphin skins, they'd probably become faster in water, but that does not break the limits of human physicality -- swimmers are still the same, regardless of technology. Any advancement is cheating in the sense that it prohibits people people with no access to the technology or a drug that makes You good at that particular sport from competing. It also cheats people from the past -- a person from the past might be better than the best runners of today, but the runners of today outperform his record just thanks to new shoe technology.