Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by cmn32480 on Sunday May 07 2017, @07:06PM   Printer-friendly
from the when-the-First-Amendment-isn't-clear-enough dept.

NPR reports:

On college campuses, outrage over provocative speakers sometimes turns violent.

It's becoming a pattern on campuses around the country. A speaker is invited, often by a conservative student group. Other students oppose the speaker, and maybe they protest. If the speech happens, the speaker is heckled. Sometimes there's violence.

In other cases — as with conservative commentator Ann Coulter at the University of California, Berkeley last week — the event is called off.

Now, a handful of states, including Illinois, Tennessee, Colorado and Arizona, have passed or introduced legislation designed to prevent these incidents from happening. The bills differ from state to state, but they're generally based on a model written by the Goldwater Institute, a libertarian think tank based in Arizona.

The model bill would require public universities to remain neutral on political issues, prevent them from disinviting speakers, and impose penalties for students and others who interfere with these speakers.

The author of the model bill argues that the neutrality stipulation is necessary for public institutions funded by tax dollars, "who shouldn't be forced to subsidize speech that they disagree with." In response to the legislation, a Democratic North Carolina legislator criticized the bill as an unnecessary "regulation of a constitutional right." The story also mentions that "Critics say this kind of legislation could hinder a university's ability to regulate hate speech on campus," but the bill author responds that hate speech is "not well-defined in the law."

Although the proposed legislation varies by state, the model bill linked above recommends a number of initiatives, from clear campus policies on protecting free speech to severe disciplinary actions for students who interfere with that right. Perhaps the strongest section of the model bill would require that "Any student who has twice been found responsible for infringing the expressive rights of others will be suspended for a minimum of one year, or expelled" (Section 1.9).

In other free speech news, USA Today reports that the FCC is launching an investigation into an "obscene" joke by Stephen Colbert concerning Donald Trump and Vladimir Putin, which caused a Twitter firestorm and led to a trending #FireColbert hashtag. While the joke was sexually explicit, the offensive word was bleeped in broadcast. CNN has argued that the FCC is merely doing its job in investigating "a number" of complaints, but Slate notes the high legal threshold that would be necessary for a fine in this case, given the late hour of the broadcast and the three-pronged test for obscenity.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by idiot_king on Monday May 08 2017, @05:14AM (2 children)

    by idiot_king (6587) on Monday May 08 2017, @05:14AM (#506194)

    The reality is this: The demographics of the US are changing, and changing in a way that are absolutely irreversible. The Old Guard are so weary of change that they will use absolutely any chance they have to support their cause-- including inviting White Supremacist "lecturers" to their college campuses to cause outrages, only to cry "Wahhhhhhhhhhh!!! Those evil SJWs are hurting our feelings by saying we're Nazis (even though we are technically Nazis)!!!"
    Trump won months ago, the cry of a group of people dealing with this change which they brought upon themselves which they do not like, the impotent cry of a dying, racist ("They're not sending their best") and sexist ("Grab her by the....") group of people, the same kind of people causing horrid disruption at college campuses with their racist, hate-filled, and quite honestly horribly antiquated rhetoric.
    Le Pen lost in France today. The wind is blowing a certain direction. These Nazis WILL be crushed. It is just a matter of time.

  • (Score: 1) by a-zA-Z0-9$_.+!*'(),- on Monday May 08 2017, @05:56AM (1 child)

    by a-zA-Z0-9$_.+!*'(),- (3868) on Monday May 08 2017, @05:56AM (#506203)

    Le Pen lost in the context of recent spectacular waves of terrorism that caused the French to declare martial law. Is that wind going to change?

    --
    https://newrepublic.com/article/114112/anonymouth-linguistic-tool-might-have-helped-jk-rowling
    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 08 2017, @07:52AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 08 2017, @07:52AM (#506234)

      Uhhm, what?
      Despite all the crazy events that she milked for votes, she still lost.