Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by takyon on Wednesday May 10 2017, @12:01AM   Printer-friendly
from the comey-and-gone dept.

FBI Director James Comey Sacked

The Washington Post reports that:

FBI Director James B. Comey has been dismissed by the president [...] a startling move that officials said stemmed from a conclusion by Justice Department officials that he had mishandled the probe of Hillary Clinton's emails.

Previously:
Clinton Told FBI She Relied on Others' Judgment on Classified Material
FBI Recommends No Prosecution for Clinton

F.B.I. Director James Comey Is Fired by Trump

President Trump has fired FBI Director James Comey:

President Trump has fired the director of the F.B.I., James B. Comey, over his handling of the investigation into Hillary Clinton's emails, the White House said Tuesday.

[...] Under the F.B.I.'s normal rules of succession, Mr. Comey's deputy, Andrew G. McCabe, a career F.B.I. officer, becomes acting director. The White House said the search for a new director will begin immediately.

I never liked Comey (see this cluster of stories), but I doubt there will ever be an FBI Director I like.

Related:
We're Stuck With Comey

Earlier in the day...

FBI Director Comey Misstated Huma Abedin Evidence at Last Week's Hearing

ProPublica reports that most of FBI Director James Comey's testimony to Congress last Wednesday related to Huma Abedin's mishandling of classified emails was inaccurate, and that FBI officials are privately acknowledging the mistake(s) but are still considering their next move:

FBI director James Comey generated national headlines last week with his dramatic testimony to the Senate Judiciary Committee, explaining his "incredibly painful" decision to go public about the Hillary Clinton emails found on Anthony Weiner's laptop.

Perhaps Comey's most surprising revelation was that Huma Abedin — Weiner's wife and a top Clinton deputy — had made "a regular practice" of forwarding "hundreds and thousands" of Clinton messages to her husband, "some of which contain classified information." Comey testified that Abedin had done this so that the disgraced former congressman could print them out for her boss. (Weiner's laptop was seized after he came under criminal investigation for sex crimes, following a media report about his online relationship with a teenager.)

The New York Post plastered its story on the front page with a photo of an underwear-clad Weiner and the headline: "HARD COPY: Huma sent Weiner classified Hillary emails to print out." The Daily News went with a similar front-page screamer: "HUMA ERROR: Sent classified emails to sext maniac Weiner."

The problem: Much of what Comey said about this was inaccurate. Now the FBI is trying to figure out what to do about it. FBI officials have privately acknowledged that Comey misstated what Abedin did and what the FBI investigators found. On Monday, the FBI was said to be preparing to correct the record by sending a letter to Congress later this week. But that plan now appears on hold, with the bureau undecided about what to do.

[...] According to two sources familiar with the matter — including one in law enforcement — Abedin forwarded only a handful of Clinton emails to her husband for printing — not the "hundreds and thousands" cited by Comey. It does not appear Abedin made "a regular practice" of doing so. Other officials said it was likely that most of the emails got onto the computer as a result of backups of her Blackberry.

Also at Washington Post (alternate analysis), The Hill, The New York Post, and USA Today.


Original Submission #1Original Submission #2Original Submission #3

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 5, Informative) by The Mighty Buzzard on Wednesday May 10 2017, @02:00AM (4 children)

    You know, they invented these things called "cookies" a while back. We hand them out free with every login. They make it so you don't have to log back in again for up to a year. If you're worried about tracking, don't. We don't even run access logs for apache unless we're actively debugging something. That's how serious we take your privacy. We affirmatively want to be able to tell the government or lawyers "fuck if we know, we don't log that" if they come asking questions. It would in fact make my entire year to be able to tell them precisely how they could suck it.

    --
    My rights don't end where your fear begins.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +3  
       Informative=3, Total=3
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   5  
  • (Score: 2) by Soylentbob on Wednesday May 10 2017, @08:40PM (3 children)

    by Soylentbob (6519) on Wednesday May 10 2017, @08:40PM (#507732)

    But you do store the IP for anonymous posts, right? When I post anonymously, the mod-option is not available. When I switch network (arrive in my workplace, switch to wifi) and get a new IP, I get the mod-options

    • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Wednesday May 10 2017, @10:50PM (2 children)

      Nah, we store salted hashes of the IP address and subnet. If not directly asked for both the salt and the hash, we're under no obligation to mention that's how we roll and can simply say we do not log IP addresses except in the Apache error log. And even then it's on them to build their own rainbow table for that salt, keeping in mind that if you're coming in over IPv6 there's no way in hell they can build a rainbow table that big in the foreseeable future.

      --
      My rights don't end where your fear begins.
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 11 2017, @02:38AM (1 child)

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 11 2017, @02:38AM (#507892)

        Nah, we store salted hashes of the IP address and subnet.

        That's easy AF to reverse, the salt is no secret and the IP address space is tiny,

        If not directly asked for both the salt and the hash, we're under no obligation to mention that's how we roll and can simply say we do not log IP addresses

        Ah, the internet lawyer! The most expert of all lawyers. Sounds like you would like a trip to jail.