Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Monday May 15 2017, @07:04AM   Printer-friendly
from the phme dept.

Submitted via IRC for TheMightyBuzzard

Since 2008, most of Intel's chipsets have contained a tiny homunculus computer called the "Management Engine" (ME). The ME is a largely undocumented master controller for your CPU: it works with system firmware during boot and has direct access to system memory, the screen, keyboard, and network. All of the code inside the ME is secret, signed, and tightly controlled by Intel. Last week, vulnerabilities in the Active Management (AMT) module in some Management Engines have caused lots of machines with Intel CPUs to be disastrously vulnerable to remote and local attackers. While AMT can be disabled, there is presently no way to disable or limit the Management Engine in general. Intel urgently needs to provide one.

[...] EFF believes that Intel needs to provide a minimum level of transparency and user control of the Management Engines inside our computers, in order to prevent this cybersecurity disaster from recurring. Unless that happens, we are concerned that it may not be appropriate to use Intel CPUs in many kinds of critical infrastructure systems.

It's a crying shame the what the EFF says doesn't hold a whole lot of weight.

Source: The Electronic Frontier Foundation


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by TheRaven on Monday May 15 2017, @01:37PM

    by TheRaven (270) on Monday May 15 2017, @01:37PM (#510000) Journal

    So you told them, it wasn't you attacking them but Dell enabling the compromise of your machine and allowing a 3rd party to use your network to attack them?

    [Disclaimer: I wasn't involved in the incident directly, so this is all from what people who were have told me:] They were actually very helpful in pinpointing the source and once the attacks were stopped didn't take it any further. I doubt that they had a case against Dell.

    Serious point being, could Intel's insurers take the hit from a bug in the ME that was exploited on the scale of the recent ransomware attack?

    There isn't any precedent for liability for associating liability with off-the-shelf software and it's not really a precedent that I'd be happy seeing set.

    --
    sudo mod me up
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2