Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Monday May 15 2017, @05:24AM   Printer-friendly
from the psyops dept.

The Guardian has an interesting article describing how Robert Mercer, Steve Bannon and Nigel Farage used techniques developed within the military to influence Britain's vote to exit the EU. Although it appears that the companies involved (AggregateIQ and Cambridge Analytics) are private companies, they have deep roots within the military.

The article describes Britain as a "managed democracy", with major decisions controlled by a US Billionaire.

[ n1: The article is an interesting read, including a reference to how in 2013, Google Founder Eric Schmidt's daughter Sophie suggested Cambridge Analytics get in touch with Palantir, Peter Thiel's data mining contractor for the GCHQ and many US military and intelligence agencies. Sophie currently works at Uber. According to a former employee, in 2013 Cambridge Analytics was just a "psychological warfare firm [...] before we became this dark, dystopian data company". ]

It was with AggregateIQ that Vote Leave (the official Leave campaign) chose to spend £3.9m, more than half its official £7m campaign budget. As did three other affiliated Leave campaigns: BeLeave, Veterans for Britain and the Democratic Unionist party, spending a further £757,750. “Coordination” between campaigns is prohibited under UK electoral law, unless campaign expenditure is declared, jointly. It wasn’t.

[...] The Electoral Commission has written to AggregateIQ. A source close to the investigation said that AggregateIQ responded by saying it had signed a non-disclosure agreement. And since it was outside British jurisdiction, that was the end of it. Vote Leave refers to this as the Electoral Commission giving it “a clean bill of health”.

[...] I asked David Banks, Veterans for Britain’s head of communications, why they spent the money with AggregateIQ. “I didn’t find AggegrateIQ. They found us. They rang us up and pitched us. There’s no conspiracy here. [...] Their targeting was based on a set of technologies that hadn’t reached the UK yet. A lot of it was proprietary, they’d found a way of targeting people based on behavioural insights."


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by turgid on Monday May 15 2017, @08:11PM (1 child)

    by turgid (4318) Subscriber Badge on Monday May 15 2017, @08:11PM (#510205) Journal

    It's about loyalty to the majority population in NI. Note that the majority in NI want it to remain part of the UK.

    The demographics of Northern Ireland have changed some since the last time they were asked. The proportion of Republicans has increased. Also, they voted (narrowly) to stay in the EU, so Brexit may tip the balance in favour of reunification, so that they can stay in the EU by being part of Eire.

    The EU does a far better job of investing in the poorest parts of the UK than our own Home Counties-obsessed perpetual Tory governments do. One of the many fantasies peddled by the pro-Leave people was that being out of the EU we'd have more choice of what we did with our own money, implying that the less rich regions could get more investment. Historically, that has never happened. Why should things be any different now? They Tories are still Tories (Conservative and UKIP). The money stays in and around London, in the hands of the Establishment. The rest of us get the crumbs from the table.

    What we are witnessing just now is the Establishment, in the form of the Conservative Party, and its propaganda mouthpiece the Daily Mail, doing a very effective psychological campaign to keep control, to silence dissent (May doesn't do debates and she doesn't do serious interviews) and to keep the United Kingdom together at all costs. Are there any reasons other than sentimentality for keeping the UK together?

    If the UK breaks up, it will be sad, but Brexit is going to be very painful. I believe it will be better for those who can to save themselves and to get out while they can.

    Brexit means Brexit. There is no turning back. Strong and stable.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Whoever on Monday May 15 2017, @08:45PM

    by Whoever (4524) on Monday May 15 2017, @08:45PM (#510224) Journal

    Yes, the proportion of Republicans has increased, but I don't think that it has reached 50% yet.

    I don't think there is a strong desire in England to keep NI in the UK if the majority population of NI wants to leave. That will happen (higher birth rate among Catholics), but it hasn't happened yet.