Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Wednesday May 17 2017, @11:21AM   Printer-friendly
from the leakers-are-everywhere dept.

President Donald Trump disclosed highly classified information to Russia's foreign minister about a planned Islamic State operation, two U.S. officials said on Monday, plunging the White House into another controversy just months into Trump's short tenure in office.

The intelligence, shared at a meeting last week with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov and Russian Ambassador Sergei Kislyak, was supplied by a U.S. ally in the fight against the militant group, both officials with knowledge of the situation said.

The White House declared the allegations, first reported by the Washington Post, incorrect.

[...] One of the officials said the intelligence discussed by Trump in his meeting with Lavrov was classified "Top Secret" and held in a secure "compartment" to which only a handful of intelligence officials have access.

After Trump's disclosure of the information, which one of the officials described as spontaneous, officials immediately called the CIA and the National Security Agency, both of which have agreements with a number of allied intelligence services around the world, and informed them what had happened.

http://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-trump-russia-idUSKCN18B2MX

Also at The Washington Post and The New York Times.

[Update.] According to Ars Technica, President Trump then proceeded to Tweet information about this meeting:

Statements from President Trump on Twitter and from White House National Security Advisor Lt. Gen. H.R. McMaster did not directly contradict details initially reported by the Washington Post late on Monday. McMaster said that no sources or methods were exposed in the conversation. However, the unnamed officials cited in the Post report were concerned that Trump's citing of the exact location "in the Islamic State’s territory where the US intelligence partner detected the threat" could expose the source. Tuesday morning, Trump tweeted:

As President I wanted to share with Russia (at an openly scheduled W.H. meeting) which I have the absolute right to do, facts pertaining....

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 16, 2017

...to terrorism and airline flight safety. Humanitarian reasons, plus I want Russia to greatly step up their fight against ISIS & terrorism.

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 16, 2017

Trump also lashed out at the intelligence community for leaking about his actions:

I have been asking Director Comey & others, from the beginning of my administration, to find the LEAKERS in the intelligence community.....

— Donald J. Trump (@realDonaldTrump) May 16, 2017


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by zocalo on Wednesday May 17 2017, @04:17PM (1 child)

    by zocalo (302) on Wednesday May 17 2017, @04:17PM (#511180)
    Exactly. I'm sure there's a lot of mutual trust between the intelligence agencies over how much of the raw intel gets provided in briefings in order to enable politicians to make decisions, especially regarding sources and methods, but there's also a very strong "better safe than sorry" mindset too, especially if it really was the Israelis that provided the data. That could mean the US failing to connect the dots on a possible threat because two foreign intelligence agencies chose not to share the additional details that would have enabled that connection to be made; the same geographical location of their sources, the same superiors, or whatever else.

    As for Moscow and Putin; yeah, I'll bet they're loving this. If there's even the slightest clue in their transcript that could lead someone to deduce something about the source of the intel and they disclose it publically... The US needs to get on top of this ASAP, because depending on what was actually said (or not) Trump may have inadvertantly provided Moscow not just with the means to drive a wedge between the intelligence communities of the US and its allies, but to do so over Syria; an area where the US and Moscow have major differences of opinion. What's not for them to like?
    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 2) by davester666 on Friday May 19 2017, @07:41AM

    by davester666 (155) on Friday May 19 2017, @07:41AM (#512067)

    Given how Trump is reported to demand information, namely, it must be boiled down to a single page of bullet points, how can you give him enough information to even remotely do his job in any sort of reasonable way?