Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by on Sunday May 21 2017, @09:41PM   Printer-friendly
from the amazon-would-never-be-underhanded dept.

Very recently, Amazon made a small, barely noticeable tweak to the way it sells books. And that little tweak has publishers very, very worried.

The change has to do with what Amazon calls the "Buy Box." That's the little box on the right-hand side of Amazon product pages that lets you buy stuff through the company's massive retail enterprise.

[...] It used to be that when you were shopping for a new copy of a book and clicked "Add to Cart," you were buying the book from Amazon itself. Amazon, in turn, had bought the book from its publisher or its publisher's wholesalers, just like if you went to any other bookstore selling new copies of books. There was a clear supply chain that sent your money directly into the pockets of the people who wrote and published the book you were buying.

But now, reports The Huffington Post, that's no longer the default scenario. Now you might be buying the book from Amazon, or you might be buying it from a third-party seller. And there's no guarantee that if the latter is true, said third-party seller bought the book from the publisher. In fact, it's most likely they didn't.

Which means the publisher might not be getting paid. And, by extension, neither is the author.

Understandably, both publishers and authors are deeply unhappy about this change.

-- submitted from IRC


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Arik on Monday May 22 2017, @01:15AM (2 children)

    by Arik (4543) on Monday May 22 2017, @01:15AM (#513241) Journal
    I know I know I read that too but it makes no sense. Just how many of these promotional copies are they sending out? How can that number possibly be large enough to have the effect? I mean if it is, then again, obviously the publishers need to quit sending out such unreasonably large numbers of promo copies and/or start marking them 'not for resale' which you'd think they would be doing from the start, so it's still not a very good answer even if we believe it.

    --
    If laughter is the best medicine, who are the best doctors?
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by butthurt on Monday May 22 2017, @02:40AM (1 child)

    by butthurt (6141) on Monday May 22 2017, @02:40AM (#513281) Journal

    > How can that number possibly be large enough to have the effect?

    Again from the article:

    If the Buy Box winner for a book is out of stock, it will look to most customers as though the book is out of stock everywhere.

    It goes on to say that buyers can find sellers nonetheless. If that's correct, a seller needn't have a large supply of books to create a problem.

    > [...] start marking them 'not for resale' which you'd think they would be doing from the start [...]

    I don't know why they haven't been. At a guess, perhaps reviewers prefer to receive copies that are not stamped "not for resale" precisely because the reviewers wish to sell on those books, and are perhaps inclined to give more favourable reviews as a result.

    • (Score: 2) by FakeBeldin on Monday May 22 2017, @03:13PM

      by FakeBeldin (3360) on Monday May 22 2017, @03:13PM (#513529) Journal

      I agree that Amazon should clearly distinguish between one seller being out of stock and an item being out of stock for all sellers.