Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday May 24 2017, @03:13PM   Printer-friendly

For the first time in 10 years, the Prime Minister said the terror threat had been raised to the highest possible level, from 
severe to critical, meaning an attack 
is "expected imminently".

[...] Mrs May also announced that troops would replace police officers at set-piece events including sports venues and concerts.

It will be the first time since 2003 – when the Government reacted to a plot to bring down an airliner – that troops are deployed on the streets.

[...] It is the first time Britain has been on maximum terrorist alert since 2007, when a blazing car loaded with gas canisters was driven into Glasgow Airport.

Source: The Telegraph


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 24 2017, @06:26PM (11 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 24 2017, @06:26PM (#515004)

    Surah 4 An-Nisa, Ayat 29

    ​ (وَلَا تَقۡتُلُوۡۤا اَنۡـفُسَكُمۡ​ؕ اِنَّ اللّٰهَ كَانَ بِكُمۡ رَحِيۡمًا‏ ﴿4:29

    Truly, you are an idiot, Runaway, and easily mislead.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Funny=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Funny' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1  
  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Wednesday May 24 2017, @06:37PM (5 children)

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday May 24 2017, @06:37PM (#515012) Journal

    I'm the idiot? Really?

    0 YOU who have attained to faith! Do not devour one another's possessions wrongfully - not even by way of trade based on mutual agreement38 - and do not destroy one another: for, behold, God is indeed a dispenser of grace unto you!

    That is a commandment that one Muslim should not try to take another Muslim's possessions. It says nothing, in that verse, about unbelievers. There are a lot of verses that deal with unbelievers, though - http://www.thereligionofpeace.com/pages/quran/violence.aspx [thereligionofpeace.com]

    The Quran contains at least 109 verses that call Muslims to war with nonbelievers for the sake of Islamic rule. Some are quite graphic, with commands to chop off heads and fingers and kill infidels wherever they may be hiding. Muslims who do not join the fight are called 'hypocrites' and warned that Allah will send them to Hell if they do not join the slaughter.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 24 2017, @06:54PM (4 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 24 2017, @06:54PM (#515028)

      Rather strange translation. I take it you cannot read Arabic? So how do you know this interpretation is correct? Yes, Runaway, you are a child, a Trump, taking a position purely out of fear and emotion about things you really do not understand at all. If I were you, I would try to say less, so as not to reveal your ignorance even more.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 24 2017, @07:30PM (3 children)

        by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 24 2017, @07:30PM (#515059)

        Rather strange translation. I take it you cannot read Arabic? So how do you know this interpretation is correct?

        We all have access to multiple translations from different scholars who can read classical Arabic. These translations all say pretty much the same thing. Of course, Muhammed and his followers were mostly illiterate and there are so many misused imported words, that serious scholars conclude the Quran does not really make sense in any language. So I put the question to you: Can you read classical Arabic? Even then, how do you know your interpretation is correct?

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 24 2017, @07:58PM (2 children)

          by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 24 2017, @07:58PM (#515076)

          What interpretation? I have offered none!

          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 24 2017, @08:16PM (1 child)

            by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 24 2017, @08:16PM (#515083)

            Rather strange translation...

            What interpretation? I have offered none!

            You deny both translation and interpretation are required to assert a translation was strange? You're arguing an-Nisa 4:29 [islamawakened.com] is not specifically referring to muslims?

            • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 24 2017, @08:45PM

              by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 24 2017, @08:45PM (#515097)

              Are you one of those idiots that thinks that non-US citizens do not have rights under the US Constitution?

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 24 2017, @06:47PM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 24 2017, @06:47PM (#515023)

    Sigh... [cbn.com]

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 24 2017, @07:21PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 24 2017, @07:21PM (#515051)

      Goldstein's Book [amazon.com]. Also demolishes Judaism and Christianity,

  • (Score: 1) by kurenai.tsubasa on Wednesday May 24 2017, @07:37PM (1 child)

    by kurenai.tsubasa (5227) on Wednesday May 24 2017, @07:37PM (#515065) Journal

    I don't have a go-to preferred translation for this one such as The Message, my favorite for the works collected in the Bible, but let's see if one of these will do [islamawakened.com]. I'm also familiar enough with those works to be able to evaluate how close a particular translation may be to the mark.

    As translated by Wahiduddin Khan:

    Believers, do not wrongfully consume each others wealth, but trade with it by mutual consent. Do not kill one another, for God is most merciful to you.

    • (Score: 1) by kurenai.tsubasa on Wednesday May 24 2017, @09:16PM

      by kurenai.tsubasa (5227) on Wednesday May 24 2017, @09:16PM (#515122) Journal

      I'm also familiar enough with those works to be able to evaluate how close a particular translation may be to the mark.

      I think I meant to type a “not” in that sentence somewhere, as in I'll admit I have no clue. However I also forgot to do my usual thing where I add context.

      (25) If any of you cannot afford to marry a free believing woman let him marry one of his believing maids whom he possesses. God best knows your faith. You are one of another. So marry them with their owners permission, and give them their dower according to what is fair, neither committing fornication nor taking secret paramours. And if, after they are married, they commit adultery they shall have half the punishment prescribed for a free woman. This is for those of you who fear lest he should fall into sin. But that it is better for you to practise self restraint. God is most forgiving and merciful.

      (26) God wishes to explain things to you and guide you to the ways of those who have gone before you and to turn to you in mercy. God is all knowing and all wise. (27) He wishes to turn towards you in mercy, but those who follow their own passions want you to drift far away from the right path. (28) God wishes to lighten your burdens, for, man has been created weak.

      (29) Believers, do not wrongfully consume each others wealth, but trade with it by mutual consent. Do not kill one another, for God is most merciful to you. (30) If anyone does these things through transgression and injustice, We shall cast him into the Fire; and that is easy for God. (31) If you shun the great sins you have been forbidden, We shall cancel out your minor misdeeds and admit you to a place of honour. (32) Do not covet the bounties which God has bestowed more abundantly on some of you than on others. Men shall be rewarded according to their deeds, and women shall be rewarded according to their deeds. You should rather ask God for His bounty. God has knowledge of all things.

      I made up the paragraph breaks there out of whole cloth.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 24 2017, @08:12PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday May 24 2017, @08:12PM (#515082)

    I'll just leave this video on the abrogation in Islam [youtube.com] among many other things.

    The tl;dw is that Islamic scripture is self-contradictionary and doublethink is deeply ingrained in it's rhetoric. Mutually exclusive ideas are held as equally true and later verses are simply "more true" than the earlier ones.