Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 18 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Thursday May 25 2017, @12:04PM   Printer-friendly
from the plugging-electric-vehicles dept.

The rate at which new technologies get accepted into the mainstream never fails to confuse people. For the longest time, cell phones appeared to be the exclusive domain of yuppies, bankers and drug dealers. And then, suddenly, my mum had one. (No, she doesn't sell drugs.)

Could we see a similar rapid adoption for electric vehicles?

The LA Times reports that Q1 electric car (EV) sales are up 91% in California. Sales of Plug-In Hybrids (PHEV) are up 54% too. This is, of course, only one quarter, from one state, so let's not get too excited. And the actual number of units sold—13,804 EVs and 10,466 PHEVs—is still tiny compared to the 506,745 cars and light trucks sold in the state during the same period. But anyone who knows anything about math can tell you that it doesn't take long for a 91% growth rate to start making serious inroads into a particular market. (Electric car sales in Norway have already reached as high as 37% of new passenger vehicles.)

It's possible the muscle memory developed for cellphones could help with EV adoption, too: plug in the phone at night, plug in the car at night.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by FatPhil on Thursday May 25 2017, @12:48PM (11 children)

    by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Thursday May 25 2017, @12:48PM (#515425) Homepage
    > But anyone who knows anything about math[sic] can tell you that it doesn't take long for a 91% growth rate to start making serious inroads into a particular market.

    But anyone who really knows anything about maths would never confuse a logistic curve for an exponential one, and is well aware that at the start they are indistinguishable. They are also (both) annoyingly numerically unstable when it comes to extrapolation, so anyone making precise predictions is using a combination of wishful thinking and pulling numbers out of a dark orifice.
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Informative=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Informative' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by PiMuNu on Thursday May 25 2017, @01:06PM (2 children)

    by PiMuNu (3823) on Thursday May 25 2017, @01:06PM (#515434)

    > logistic curve for an exponential one

    It's clearly logistic. The excitement is that the logistic curve is on an upward trend, with a maximum >> 0. That's not been true of electric vehicles for the past 20 years.

    • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Thursday May 25 2017, @01:57PM (1 child)

      by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Thursday May 25 2017, @01:57PM (#515458) Homepage
      Excitement should not be an excuse to introduce misleading mathematics. Like most explicit uses of "exponential" in the media, this implicit suggestion that the growth will be exponential does nothing but harm people's comprehension of mathematics.
      --
      Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
  • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 25 2017, @01:28PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday May 25 2017, @01:28PM (#515446)

    Rather, we're talking about math.

  • (Score: 2) by bzipitidoo on Thursday May 25 2017, @04:07PM (3 children)

    by bzipitidoo (4388) on Thursday May 25 2017, @04:07PM (#515523) Journal

    99% of people aren't knowledgeable enough about math not to confuse logistic for exponential. Exponential growth is used in all kinds of places maybe it shouldn't be, such as interest rates and economic growth rates, Moore's law, and population growth. I think exponential interest rates can work, as long as inflation is also exponential. So $1000 banked at 1% annual compound interest for 3000 years will not grow to more wealth than humanity has ever produced because inflation will reduce its real value to something manageable, maybe even eliminate its apparent growth entirely.

    BTW, why not call it an "S" curve, since you're complaining about comprehensibility? Lot more people understand that.

    • (Score: 2) by mcgrew on Thursday May 25 2017, @06:42PM (1 child)

      by mcgrew (701) <publish@mcgrewbooks.com> on Thursday May 25 2017, @06:42PM (#515615) Homepage Journal

      Indeed. When Rauner was running for governor, he claimed that state employeed had an average income of $65,000 a year, which is true, but the MEDIAN is closer to half that.

      --
      mcgrewbooks.com mcgrew.info nooze.org
    • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Thursday May 25 2017, @09:16PM

      by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Thursday May 25 2017, @09:16PM (#515710) Homepage
      Why not "S cuarve"? Because the context was people who know something about maths.
      --
      Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
  • (Score: 2, Informative) by mcgrew on Thursday May 25 2017, @06:39PM (2 children)

    by mcgrew (701) <publish@mcgrewbooks.com> on Thursday May 25 2017, @06:39PM (#515613) Homepage Journal

    > But anyone who knows anything about math[sic]

    Math [merriam-webster.com]

    You forget that over here we say "trunk", not "boot" and "hood", not "bonnet". You have the OED, we have Webster's.

    --
    mcgrewbooks.com mcgrew.info nooze.org
    • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Thursday May 25 2017, @09:14PM (1 child)

      by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Thursday May 25 2017, @09:14PM (#515709) Homepage
      Yes, but if the US editors can [sic] English spellings, then I can [sic] US spellings.
      --
      Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 26 2017, @02:57AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday May 26 2017, @02:57AM (#515804)

        It's almost as annoying when you do it.