SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
Philippine President Rodrigo Duterte declared martial law Tuesday in the southern region of Mindanao, after deadly clashes between security forces and Islamic State group-linked militants in a major city there.
The announcement, made by his spokesman at a press conference in Moscow where Duterte was on an official visit, fulfills an often-repeated warning by the president that he would enforce military rule to quell security threats. "As of 10:00pm Manila time (1400 GMT) Duterte has declared martial law for the entire island of Mindanao," spokesman Ernesto Abella said in the nationally televised briefing. Abella said martial law would be in place for 60 days, in line with constitutional limits on the use of military rule.
Martial law is particularly sensitive in the Philippines because it was used by dictator Ferdinand Marcos to remain in power during his two-decade reign, which ended in 1986 with a "People Power" revolution.
Mindanao is made up of a large island of the same name, plus smaller islands, and the region of about 20 million people makes up roughly one third of the mainly Catholic country.
[...] The announcement came after security forces battled dozens of IS-linked gunmen in a built-up area of Marawi, a city of about 200,000 people in Mindanao, on Tuesday.
Source: Yahoo! News
In the Philippines, concerns are mounting over the proliferation of Islamic State affiliates on the southern islands of Mindanao. Jihadist groups in the region have been coalescing under the extremist group's flag since the head of Abu Sayyaf, Isnilon Hapilon, declared his allegiance to Islamic State leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi in 2014. Less than a decade earlier, Mindanao's various Islamic State affiliates were a jumble of local gangs engaged in criminal activity under the dubious banner of jihad.
By adopting the Islamic State's moniker and mimicking some of its tactics, Hapilon and other jihadist leaders in the Philippines have gained legitimacy, along with notoriety, as part of a well-known, transnational movement. But beyond that, the benefits of taking up the Islamic State banner have been marginal.
Source: Stratfor article published earlier this year.
Additional coverage:
Previous stories:
G20 Summit Roundup
The Woman Who Kills Drug Dealers for a Living
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 27 2017, @12:51PM (1 child)
WTF? Did you just try to eurosplain to me about muslims in India?
Clue for you mister dumbfuck — I am a muslim from india.
As for your hand-waving about africa, WTF? None of what you wrote in anyway creates organized conflict by minority muslim populations in the listed countries.
Seriously, what the hell is wrong with you? You were totally fucking wrong, own it.
(Score: 2) by cubancigar11 on Saturday May 27 2017, @06:09PM
WTF indeed. Please try to tell me where I am talking about Muslims in India. Ever heard about the Kashmir conflict? Kashmir is the only state of India where the minority Muslims are in local majority. Ever heard of Assam? What I am saying, you know it very well, being a Muslim in India. Guess what, Islam does have a problem of not being able to check its extremists. Own it, fix it.
And I don't know what is "eurosplain". The point a logical person would read into - the point I was trying to make - was that conflicts can have non-religious beginnings, but only Islam has a problem of constantly giving into armed conflicts.
And one advice - start talking like a mature person and not like a triggered harpies on twitter. Here is what I wrote: "Muslim minorities with local majority". You brought up Africa as peaceful countries with minority Muslim population. I told you that among those countries, wherever Muslims are in local majority they are in armed conflict. I also showed you that it may not be because of religious differences, but that doesn't change the FACT.
I don't care about your emotions. HTH
I was totally fucking right and you need to cut down on rhetoric if you want me to say something otherwise.