Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday May 26 2017, @10:30PM   Printer-friendly
from the it's-okay-so-long-as-you-don't-get-caught? dept.

The Vermont Department of Motor Vehicles [DMV] has been caught using facial recognition software — despite a state law preventing it.

Documents obtained by the American Civil Liberties Union of Vermont describe such a program, which uses software to compare the DMV's database of names and driver's license photos with information with state and federal law enforcement. Vermont state law, however, specifically states that "The Department of Motor Vehicles shall not implement any procedures or processes... that involve the use of biometric identifiers."

The program, the ACLU says, invites state and federal agencies to submit photographs of persons of interest to the Vermont DMV, which it compares against its database of some 2.6 million photos and shares potential matches. Since 2012, the agency has run at least 126 such searches on behalf of local police, the State Department, FBI, and Immigrations and Customs Enforcement.

Source: Vocativ


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by deimtee on Saturday May 27 2017, @11:05AM (1 child)

    by deimtee (3272) on Saturday May 27 2017, @11:05AM (#516366) Journal

    Does "fruit of the poisoned tree" apply though? It's not like they searched someones property without a warrant.
    It's a state law, forbidding the DMV from using biometrics, not forbidding the transfer of information to other departments.

    --
    If you cough while drinking cheap red wine it really cleans out your sinuses.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1) by Demena on Saturday May 27 2017, @11:21AM

    by Demena (5637) on Saturday May 27 2017, @11:21AM (#516370)

    Maybe. I am not a lawyer. Usually though a break in the chain is a break in the chain.