Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Saturday May 27 2017, @12:03AM   Printer-friendly
from the good+fast+cheap? dept.

Intel is planning to make the Thunderbolt specification royalty-free, and include support for the protocol on its CPUs rather than on external chips:

Intel's dream of making one cable to rule them all took a huge step forward this week. On Wednesday, Intel announced it will integrate Thunderbolt 3 into future CPUs. More importantly, the company said it would open up the long-secret protocol to the world, royalty-free. The company's explanation for the change is practically utopian. "Intel's vision for Thunderbolt was not just to make a faster computer port, but a simpler and more versatile port available to everyone," wrote Chris Walker, Intel's vice president for Client Computing, in a blog post.

[...] By moving Thunderbolt onto the CPU, Intel says it can lower the cost and the power requirements. Intel didn't actually detail which CPUs would get Thunderbolt 3 or when. If it's truly coming to all of them, it would mean every PC that uses an Intel chip would get the much sought-after feature. There's no fear of a proprietary lock now, either. "In addition to Intel's (CPU integrated) Thunderbolt silicon," Walker wrote, "next year Intel plans to make the Thunderbolt protocol specification available to the industry under a nonexclusive, royalty-free license."

Here's an idea: take the Intel Management Engine off at the same time.

Also at BusinessInsider, Wired, CNET, Tom's Hardware, and Ars Technica.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Insightful) by Immerman on Saturday May 27 2017, @02:53AM

    by Immerman (3985) on Saturday May 27 2017, @02:53AM (#516262)

    Forgive me if I'm paranoid, but I don't see how planning to make it a nonexclusive, royalty-free license next year removes any such fear. A legally binding perpetual royalty free license would do that, but I've heard no such intention voiced.

    Seems like making it free for a few years to catch on, and then starting to charge again for the license would be a potentially extremely profitable tactic.

    Plus - just because it's free doesn't mean there's no lock-in. Where are device manufacturers supposed to turn if Intel decides to revoke their license?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Insightful=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4