Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Saturday May 27 2017, @03:09AM   Printer-friendly
from the bottom-line dept.

As the MPAA tells it, piracy is really killing the movie industry. It's been whining about piracy for basically my entire lifetime, and constantly predicting its own demise if "something" is not done. And, despite the fact that Congress has repeatedly obliged Hollywood in ratcheting up copyright anti-piracy laws and despite the fact that the MPAA has been clearly wrong repeatedly (such that the new technologies it feared actually helped expand Hollywood's business), the studios continue to push for awful changes to copyright law, citing the horrors of piracy.
And yet... now it's coming out that Disney not only had a good year last year, it had the best year ever for a movie studio. Not surprisingly, Disney put out its own glowing press release over this:

https://www.techdirt.com/articles/20170525/10481837456/piracy-killing-hollywood-so-bad-that-disney-made-more-money-2016-than-any-studio-ever.shtml

[Also Covered By]: Disney made more money in a single year than any other movie studio—ever


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0, Troll) by idiot_king on Saturday May 27 2017, @03:24AM (10 children)

    by idiot_king (6587) on Saturday May 27 2017, @03:24AM (#516276)

    ...just because Disney has billions upon billions, that makes dishonesty honorable?
    Is that the implication, here?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   -1  
       Troll=3, Insightful=1, Underrated=1, Total=5
    Extra 'Troll' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   0  
  • (Score: 0, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 27 2017, @03:35AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 27 2017, @03:35AM (#516282)

    What you wrote is so vague that it is meaningless.

    You mention dishonesty but you leave out a reference regarding WHO is dishonest.
    As such what you wrote is just meaningless drivel.

    But you DO live up to your nickname : IdiotKing.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 27 2017, @03:48AM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 27 2017, @03:48AM (#516287)

    Not at all. But the movie industry insists pirates are worse than murderers and lobbies for ever-increasing penalties against them. If you steal something that costs $20 from the store, you're guilty of misdemeanor theft at most. If you download one $20 movie, they want to fine you $10,000 and/or put you in prison for years. That's what people object to - the disproportionate punishment for a minor crime, only possible because every politician has their hand in the movie industry's pockets.

    • (Score: 5, Informative) by NotSanguine on Saturday May 27 2017, @04:20AM (2 children)

      That's what people object to - the disproportionate punishment for a what should be a civil tort [wikipedia.org] at most, only possible because every politician has their hand in the movie industry's pockets.

      There. FTFY.

      --
      No, no, you're not thinking; you're just being logical. --Niels Bohr
      • (Score: 2) by wonkey_monkey on Saturday May 27 2017, @08:35AM (1 child)

        by wonkey_monkey (279) on Saturday May 27 2017, @08:35AM (#516342) Homepage

        Mmm, torte...

        --
        systemd is Roko's Basilisk
        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 27 2017, @09:56AM

          by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 27 2017, @09:56AM (#516356)

          nomnomnomnomnom...et gateau!

  • (Score: 4, Informative) by c0lo on Saturday May 27 2017, @03:55AM

    by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Saturday May 27 2017, @03:55AM (#516288) Journal

    ...just because Disney has billions upon billions, that makes dishonesty honorable?

    Money always make dishonesty honourable, just look in how much respect the Wall Street guys and property developers are hold.
    Some of their sort even got elected/appointed in govt.

    --
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 27 2017, @07:40AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 27 2017, @07:40AM (#516335)

    ...just because Disney has billions upon billions, that makes dishonesty honorable?

    Since disney has made its billions upon billions in part by waging war on the public domain, then:
    (1) yes, we're at war;
    (2) is taking back something stolen from you dishonest (as opposed to illegal)?
    (3) they declared war on us and we're responding in a way that minimises "collateral damage".

    Is that the implication, here?

    The only implication here is point (2) above - the implied answer is "no".

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 27 2017, @12:30PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday May 27 2017, @12:30PM (#516384)

    No, moron, it says that content doesn't need to be locked-up behind copyright for a hundred years. That's wasn't it's original intent, and is still unnecessary now.

  • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Saturday May 27 2017, @02:21PM

    by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Saturday May 27 2017, @02:21PM (#516416) Journal

    Sorry, but I've not been able to find the original page - this quote will have to do.
    https://crotchetybookman.blogspot.com/2010/10/baen-publishings-free-ebooks.html [blogspot.com]

    Introducing the Baen Free Library

    by Eric Flint
    Baen Books is now making available — for free — a number of its titles in electronic format. We're calling it the Baen Free Library. Anyone who wishes can read these titles online — no conditions, no strings attached. (Later we may ask for an extremely simple, name & email only, registration. ) Or, if you prefer, you can download the books in one of several formats. Again, with no conditions or strings attached. (URLs to sites which offer the readers for these format are also listed. )
    Why are we doing this? Well, for two reasons.

    The first is what you might call a "matter of principle." This all started as a byproduct of an online "virtual brawl" I got into with a number of people, some of them professional SF authors, over the issue of online piracy of copyrighted works and what to do about it.

    There was a school of thought, which seemed to be picking up steam, that the way to handle the problem was with handcuffs and brass knucks. Enforcement! Regulation! New regulations! Tighter regulations! All out for the campaign against piracy! No quarter! Build more prisons! Harsher sentences! Alles in ordnung!
    I, ah, disagreed. Rather vociferously and belligerently, in fact. And I can be a vociferous and belligerent fellow. My own opinion, summarized briefly, is as follows:

    1. Online piracy — while it is definitely illegal and immoral — is, as a practical problem, nothing more than (at most) a nuisance. We're talking brats stealing chewing gum, here, not the Barbary Pirates.

    2. Losses any author suffers from piracy are almost certainly offset by the additional publicity which, in practice, any kind of free copies of a book usually engender. Whatever the moral difference, which certainly exists, the practical effect of online piracy is no different from that of any existing method by which readers may obtain books for free or at reduced cost: public libraries, friends borrowing and loaning each other books, used book stores, promotional copies, etc.

    3. Any cure which relies on tighter regulation of the market — especially the kind of extreme measures being advocated by some people — is far worse than the disease. As a widespread phenomenon rather than a nuisance, piracy occurs when artificial restrictions in the market jack up prices beyond what people think are reasonable. The "regulation-enforcement-more regulation" strategy is a bottomless pit which continually recreates (on a larger scale) the problem it supposedly solves. And that commercial effect is often compounded by the more general damage done to social and political freedom.

    __________________

    tl/dr: fuck the fascist sons of bitches

  • (Score: 2) by wisnoskij on Saturday May 27 2017, @11:14PM

    by wisnoskij (5149) <{jonathonwisnoski} {at} {gmail.com}> on Saturday May 27 2017, @11:14PM (#516554)

    The murder rate has been dropping since the 1990s. This means it is OK to be a murderer.