Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Sunday May 28 2017, @09:27PM   Printer-friendly
from the human-beings-not-goldfish dept.

The 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals ruled to give Wikimedia a chance to legally challenge the NSA's mass surveillance as being unconstitutional. The government has previously argued that the NSA's Upstream warrantless spying is authorized under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. [...]

The ruling yesterday reversed a lower court's ruling which found Wikimedia, which publishes the internet behemoth Wikipedia, couldn't prove the NSA's "Upstream" surveillance program was secretly monitoring its communications, vacuuming the communications right off the internet backbones – even with leaked Snowden documents showing Wikipedia as an NSA target.

[...] due to the sheer size of Wikimedia, the judges found that the NSA probably had seized at least some of their communications.

Computerworld (hyperlinks in original)

"Wikimedia has plausibly alleged that its communications travel all of the roads that a communication can take, and that the NSA seizes all of the communications along at least one of those roads," U.S. Circuit Judge Albert Diaz wrote. "Thus, at least at this stage of the litigation, Wikimedia has standing to sue for a violation of the Fourth Amendment. And, because Wikimedia has self-censored its speech and sometimes forgone electronic communications in response to Upstream surveillance, it also has standing to sue for a violation of the First Amendment."

Courthouse News Service

Further reading:
Wikipedia article on Upstream
Wikipedia article on Albert Diaz

Additional coverage:

Previous stories:
US Spies Still Won't Tell Congress the Number of Americans Caught in Dragnet
Judge Tosses Wikimedia's Anti-NSA Lawsuit Because Wikipedia It Isn't Big Enough
Wikipedia's Lawsuit Against NSA Internet Vacuum has First Day in Court
Deeper Dive into EFF's Motion on Backbone Surveillance


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 4, Interesting) by butthurt on Monday May 29 2017, @01:35AM

    by butthurt (6141) on Monday May 29 2017, @01:35AM (#516956) Journal

    > Is the US strict w.r.t. freedom of speech [...]

    There was a story last month about U.S. prosecutors considering charges against Julian Assange, who published U.S. government secrets.

    /article.pl?sid=17/04/21/1213259 [soylentnews.org]

    Wikimedia hosts documents containing U.S. government secrets--if nothing else, documents stolen by Edward Snowden that pertain to the NSA itself:

    https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Category:2013_Mass_Surveillance_Disclosures [wikimedia.org]

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +2  
       Interesting=2, Total=2
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   4