Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Monday May 29 2017, @03:27AM   Printer-friendly
from the it's-all-gone-to-bits dept.

From the RooshV Forum:

I constantly get the vibe from people that they think our technology is skyrocketing, that we're living in a new tech age, "where was all this ten years ago?!" etc.

But I disagree with this assessment of our technology. It has made steady improvements in one specific space: software and electronic hardware. That is all. On top of that, the improvements on the hardware have not even been ground breaking. GPS is a ground-breaking invention. Smaller screens are not: they are just an incremental improvement.

Smartphones are merely the result of incremental improvements in the size and quality of electronic components. The only breakthroughs involved are ages old. The invention of the transistor, the laser, etc. The existence of google, facebook, uber, and so on, are merely inevitable "new applications" stemming from these improvements. They are not breakthroughs, they are merely improvements and combinations upon the telephone, the directory, and the taxi.

In my opinion, technology as a whole is borderline stagnant.

A list of why technology is still shit:

The posting goes on to list examples of incremental, rather than breakthrough, changes in the areas of:

  • Electronics & Machines
  • Energy
  • Medicine
  • Clothes
  • Food
  • Finance

Have we really stagnated? Have we already found all of the "low-hanging fruit", so new breakthroughs are harder to find? Maybe there is greater emphasis on changes that are immediately able to be commercialized and less emphasis on basic research?

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 29 2017, @12:17PM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 29 2017, @12:17PM (#517106)

    > [wsws.org]

    Unattended terminal? Or did _gewg_ hack into Runaway's account?

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 29 2017, @01:16PM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 29 2017, @01:16PM (#517121)

    Another option might be, you know nothing about Runaway. Some people focus on some specific facet of a complicated person's persona, and they think they know that person. The title of this sub-thread offers a suggestion for you to read and think about:

    http://www.constitution.org/col/blind_men.htm [constitution.org]

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 29 2017, @03:03PM

      by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 29 2017, @03:03PM (#517158)

      Another option might be, Runaway was visiting _gewg_, forgot to log out, and _gewg_ posted without noticing. Another option might be, Runaway and _gewg_ are the same person.

    • (Score: 2) by sgleysti on Monday May 29 2017, @04:43PM

      by sgleysti (56) Subscriber Badge on Monday May 29 2017, @04:43PM (#517212)

      My money is on the above AC actually being Runaway saying, in essence, "I am vast; I contain multitudes."