A look inside the company and its astonishing reach into our daily lives through a series of studies conducted by Share Labs, first reported by the BBC but without linking directly to the material posted by Share Labs.
Share Lab is a research team based in Yugoslavia: "Where indie data punk, meets media theory pop to investigate digital rights blues"
For those of us born and raised before Facebook, life has many different aspects: work, family, hobbies. In each context we may behave differently and other people might have a different impression of our personality but Facebook, by mixing it all together, is causing a "context collapse", no longer partitioning our lives.
However, one of Zuckerberg's fears is "context restoration" whereas users become aware of the Panopticon and choose to "behave" in Facebook withholding essential data and thus ruining Facebook's algorithms. It may become a LinkedIn type of site, where everything posted is highly curated for professional purposes and the "social" migrates to other platforms, such as Instagram.
It is possible that in the near future Facebook and LinkedIn will be competing for the same market: professional or skilled traders and lose some of its potency. That is why Facebook is extending its reach to other websites, tracking both Facebook users and others to keep harvesting data about our daily activities and testing algorithms to influence every decision we make.
As Douglas Rushkoff puts it:
"Facebook will market you your future before you've even gotten there, they'll use predictive algorithms to figure out what's your likely future and then try to make that even more likely. They'll get better at programming you – they'll reduce your spontaneity. "
As we all know, your social media profile has become of interest to would-be employers, law-enforcement and of course, advertisers. Some have started to demand wages for using Facebook, as we are creating the "product" they sell.
Those afraid of Big Government should be very afraid of behemoths like Facebook, Amazon, Google, Apple and others which are not hindered by the constitution or human rights. It appears that we can run but no hide.
(Score: 2) by Gaaark on Monday May 29 2017, @03:10PM (2 children)
Absolutely: from what i'm hearing, 'Facebook is for old people'... if the old people are smart and get off facepoop (or die!!), then facepoop should just disappear.
Leave facebook and help bring it's demise on quicker... and start fighting for your privacy.
--- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---
(Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Tuesday May 30 2017, @01:05PM
That's an important point. How many people now fear Friendster? They did the same thing before Facebook. MySpace? That was even bought by one of the Architects of Evil, and it's still gone and irrelevant.
Facebook amassed a huge database they can monetize for years, but if its userbase crashes the way the others have, it will be a dead, not living, datastore.
The young, too, have long since moved on. It was Instagram, but now it's SnapChat. The old might linger on FB for a while yet, but they're not who advertisers chase. Have fun marketing to septuagenarians on fixed incomes, guys.
Washington DC delenda est.
(Score: 2) by a-zA-Z0-9$_.+!*'(),- on Wednesday May 31 2017, @03:35AM
facepoop! highlarious.
https://newrepublic.com/article/114112/anonymouth-linguistic-tool-might-have-helped-jk-rowling