Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Monday May 29 2017, @08:54PM   Printer-friendly
from the bigger-means-better dept.

After several years of planning and no shortage of financial anxiety, construction has officially started on the Extremely Large Telescope. Contractors are now building the main structure and dome of the Chile-based observer ahead of its initial service in 2024. That's a long time to wait, but this is no mean feat. With a 43-yard aperture, this promises to be the world's largest optical telescope for sometime, even compared to future or in-limbo projects like the Thirty Meter Telescope. Those gigantic dimensions will help it capture far more light, giving astronomers the chance to spot particularly distant galaxies, find small planets and capture more details of larger planets.

The ELT's full capabilities won't come until sometime after 2024, when the ESO starts a second construction phase. It could easily be another few years after that before the telescope lives up to its expectations.

Source: Engadget


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by zocalo on Monday May 29 2017, @11:20PM (3 children)

    by zocalo (302) on Monday May 29 2017, @11:20PM (#517367)
    I'm actually quite amazed that they are not even really considering the possibility, and even seem somewhat dismissive of it. We're looking at 10 years of advances in both space and robotics tech before it's going to be needed, and even if they completely screw it up the JWST would have been EoL anyway so it's not like they'd have anything to lose at that point - no matter how "delicate" it is (that's how they've described it when this has come up previously). Sure, the couplings are going to be complicated, tolerances are going to be tight, and docking may have to be very gentle, but given the precision manouvering we've seen from the X37B, Russia's "Kill Sats" (Kosmos-2499 and Kosmos-2504), not to mention the various things SpaceX has been doing, it certainly seems like it might be achievable, so why not at least allow for the possibility?

    Yet another example of budget contrained short-sightedness from NASA, I guess... You have to wonder if those studies even included the possibility of having someone like SpaceX give it a go, or if they just assumed it would have to be an Atlas or SLS based launch of a home-grown service module?
    --
    UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 29 2017, @11:41PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Monday May 29 2017, @11:41PM (#517374)

    perhaps there just isnt any Congressional patronage ro get behind said efforts. the Usual Suspects would probably eventually put another telescope out there. So theres the main damper right there. And not too hard for their "it's too hard" whispers to keep those patrons from considering it, especially if it's not to be done by the Usual Suspects.

    Funny if China & Russia, perhaps with ESO help, decide to risk it. China & Russia probably have the blue prints for it already...

    but itll probably still be semi-useful as long as its reaction wheel units continue to work, like the Hershel or Kepler 'scopes were.

  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Tuesday May 30 2017, @12:07AM

    by takyon (881) <takyonNO@SPAMsoylentnews.org> on Tuesday May 30 2017, @12:07AM (#517385) Journal

    In fact, isn't the X-37B's primary mission to service satellites (or do covert things to them)?

    I think people have seen the value of the Hubble servicing missions, and if the JWST can be fixed up in the late 2020s or 2030s for under $500 million, it will get done. If a robot has to make the repairs rather than a human, so be it.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
  • (Score: 2) by kaszz on Tuesday May 30 2017, @12:34AM

    by kaszz (4211) on Tuesday May 30 2017, @12:34AM (#517394) Journal

    Or they want to be sure that it's fully stops working so they can ask for "please please we must have another telescope up there because right now we have NONE!". And so they money come to rescue the acute situation.

    Makes me also wonder what the cost of a new space telescope will be when the current one reaches its end of life. If the cost of a service mission gets too high in comparison with sending up a new one and taking into account new capabilities it might just be that it pays off anyway.