Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Wednesday May 31 2017, @05:11AM   Printer-friendly
from the another-settlement-needs-our-help dept.

The toy-like drones destroyed during an Army field exercise at Fort Sill, Okla., last month weren't anything special; however, the way they were brought down -- zapped out of the sky by lasers mounted on a Stryker armored vehicle -- might grab people's attention.

The first soldier to try out the lasers was Spc. Brandon Sallaway, a forward observer with the 4th Infantry Division. He used a Mobile Expeditionary High Energy Laser to shoot down an 18-by-10-inch drone at 650 yards, an Army statement said.

"It's nothing too complicated but you have to learn how to operate each system and get used to the controls which is exactly like a video game controller," said Sallaway, who hadn't fired a laser before the exercise.

The drone-killing laser was relatively low energy -- only 5 kilowatts -- but the Army has tested much more powerful weapons. A 30-kilowatt truck-mounted High Energy Laser Mobile Demonstrator shot down dozens of mortar rounds and several drones in November 2013 at White Sands Missile Range, N.M.

Since then, researchers have made rapid advances in laser weapons, said Bob Ruszkowski, who works on air dominance projects and unmanned systems in Lockheed's secretive Skunk Works facility.

"We're really on the cusp of seeing the introduction of lasers in future systems," he said.

Which do you prefer, lasers or plasma weapons?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by HiThere on Wednesday May 31 2017, @04:32PM (1 child)

    by HiThere (866) Subscriber Badge on Wednesday May 31 2017, @04:32PM (#518357) Journal

    A valid point, but there's no real advantage in having the most weapons if neither you nor the guy with the second amount of weapons dare to use them (against each other). In the current environment the 3rd or 4th down seems to be more advantageous than being in the top position.

    --
    Javascript is what you use to allow unknown third parties to run software you have no idea about on your computer.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 1) by khallow on Thursday June 01 2017, @12:21AM

    by khallow (3766) Subscriber Badge on Thursday June 01 2017, @12:21AM (#518593) Journal

    A valid point, but there's no real advantage in having the most weapons if neither you nor the guy with the second amount of weapons dare to use them (against each other).

    Why do you think there's no real advantage? That mass of weaponry worked real well against the targets the US has fought over the past 70 years. The US never fought the USSR directly (the second largest military power), but the US's military turned out to be a significant advantage in a variety of situations that didn't involve a direct fight with the USSR.