Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday June 02 2017, @12:44AM   Printer-friendly
from the catch-the-wave dept.

The Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) announced an observation of the merger of two black holes observed on 2017-01-04 having masses of approximately 31 and 19 times the mass of our sun (M) at a distance of approximately 880 Mpc (megaparsec) or approximately 2.8 billion light years.

From the full open access report (pdf) which was published in Physical Review Letters, by the American Physical Society (DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.221101):

We describe the observation of GW170104, a gravitational-wave signal produced by the coalescence of a pair of stellar-mass black holes. The signal was measured on January 4, 2017 at 10:11:58.6 UTC by the twin advanced detectors of the Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory during their second observing run, with a network signal-to-noise ratio of 13 and a false alarm rate less than 1 in 70,000 years. The inferred component black hole masses are 31.2+8.4
−6.0
M and 19.4+5.3
−5.9
M (at the 90% credible level). The black hole spins are best constrained through measurement of the effective inspiral spin parameter, a mass-weighted combination of the spin components perpendicular to the orbital plane, χeff = −0.12+0.21
−0.30
. This result implies that spin configurations with both component spins positively aligned with the orbital angular momentum are disfavored. The source luminosity distance is 880+450
−390
 Mpc corresponding to a redshift of z = 0.18+0.08
−0.07
. We constrain the magnitude of modifications to the gravitational-wave dispersion relation and perform null tests of general relativity. Assuming that gravitons are dispersed in vacuum like massive particles, we bound the graviton mass to mg ≤ 7.7 × 10−23 eV/c2. In all cases, we find that GW170104 is consistent with general relativity.

[...] The first observing run of the Advanced Laser Interferometer Gravitational-Wave Observatory (LIGO) [1] identified two binary black hole coalescence signals with high statistical significance, GW150914 [2] and GW151226 [3], as well as a less significant candidate LVT151012 [4,5]. These discoveries ushered in a new era of observational astronomy, allowing us to investigate the astrophysics of binary black holes and test general relativity (GR) in ways that were previously inaccessible [6,7]. We now know that there is a population of binary black holes with component masses ≳25M⊙ [5,6], and that merger rates are high enough for us to expect more detections [5,8]. Advanced LIGO’s second observing run began on November 30, 2016. On January 4, 2017, a gravitational wave signal was detected with high statistical significance. Figure 1 shows a time-frequency representation of the data from the LIGO Hanford and Livingston detectors, with the signal GW170104 visible as the characteristic chirp of a binary coalescence.


B.P. Abbott et al. (Full author list appears at the end of the linked journal article).

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article’s title, journal citation, and DOI.

Once again, no visual confirmation. This time possibly due to technical issues with one detector:

The event candidate was not reported by the low-latency analysis pipelines because re-tuning the calibration of the LIGO Hanford detector is not yet complete after the holiday shutdown. This resulted in a delay of over 4 hours before the candidate could be fully examined. We are confident that this is a highly significant event candidate, but the calibration issue may be affecting the initial sky maps.

See also:
https://dcc.ligo.org/LIGO-P170104/public


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Snotnose on Friday June 02 2017, @02:09AM (5 children)

    by Snotnose (1623) on Friday June 02 2017, @02:09AM (#519160)

    10 minutes. 10 minutes since I hit refresh. And already a "your mom" reference, which would have been funny had I made it but, as you made it, is just typical.

    / this site is going to hell
    // handbasket at aisle 8
    /// happens to be the self checkout lane

    --
    Why shouldn't we judge a book by it's cover? It's got the author, title, and a summary of what the book's about.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: -1, Offtopic) by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 02 2017, @02:12AM (1 child)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 02 2017, @02:12AM (#519162)

    //// unexpected item in bagging area
    ///// remove this item before continuing

    • (Score: -1, Offtopic) by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 02 2017, @05:45AM

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 02 2017, @05:45AM (#519226)

      ////// Your soundcard works perfectly

  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by fido_dogstoyevsky on Friday June 02 2017, @11:31AM (2 children)

    by fido_dogstoyevsky (131) <axehandleNO@SPAMgmail.com> on Friday June 02 2017, @11:31AM (#519308)

    this site is going has gone to hell

    I've been so depressed by what seems to be the new soylent norm that I wandered over to the green site for a bit; calm, rational discussion compared to here. Hence the correction.

    We desperately need an "ignore" list like at linuxquestions.org (to filter not opinion, but the ratbags who insist on turning adult discussions into trollfests).

    --
    It's NOT a conspiracy... it's a plot.
    • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Unixnut on Friday June 02 2017, @04:49PM (1 child)

      by Unixnut (5779) on Friday June 02 2017, @04:49PM (#519436)

      > We desperately need an "ignore" list like at linuxquestions.org (to filter not opinion, but the ratbags who insist on turning adult discussions into trollfests).

      The problem is that an "ignore" list basically ruins the whole point of a public forum. Yes, so most people can agree that the turd that posts "your mum" etc... can be ignored.

      However what I suspect will happen after that, is people will start ignoring others who disagree with their opinions, or who are not the type of person they would normally converse with.

      Eventually what I suspect will happen is that SN will split into little bubbles, where everyone just sees the comments of people who they didn't ignore. At that point you cease having discussions, and instead it becomes an echo chamber for your views. And anyone browsing as anonymous would see just a bunch of parallel conversations with no cross contamination of ideas. The opposite of what you want from a site such as this.

      LQ is different, because it is fundamentally about helping people with technical issues. SN is more about general non-technical discussion (although there is usually some of it). Last thing SN needs to do is turn into facebook or one of the other places.

      Might be a better idea to be able to report such posts for spam, etc... but even then it will only be of limited use even then. The price of an open forum is ratbags will shit in the pool just because.

      And I suspected that as SN gets more popular, more of the people who ruined /. will migrate as well. Popularity will result in that, unfortunately.

      • (Score: 2) by fido_dogstoyevsky on Saturday June 03 2017, @12:10AM

        by fido_dogstoyevsky (131) <axehandleNO@SPAMgmail.com> on Saturday June 03 2017, @12:10AM (#519647)

        The problem is that an "ignore" list basically ruins the whole point of a public forum. Yes, so most people can agree that the turd that posts "your mum" etc... can be ignored.

        However what I suspect will happen after that, is people will start ignoring others who disagree with their opinions, or who are not the type of person they would normally converse with.

        If that happens then SoylentNews was never worth going to in the first place.

        I, for one, don't ignore opinion just because I disagree with it; I do, however, ignore trolls who express an opinion with which I do agree (and I make the assumption I'm not alone). When there are too many trolls to ignore people will just leave because that's the only option they have.

        --
        It's NOT a conspiracy... it's a plot.