Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday June 02 2017, @03:50AM   Printer-friendly
from the promises-kept dept.

[Ed Note: What follows is the official press release from President Donald Trump at the White House. It marks the official stance of the United States pulling out of the Paris Agreement. Though there is certainly a political aspect to this, I would like to see if we can try to avoid political bickering and focus discussion on the actual details of the press release. See, also, our previous coverage, Report: Trump Plans to Exit Paris Climate Agreement. --martyb]

From the desk of President Donald J. Trump

For Immediate Release

June 01, 2017

President Trump Puts American Jobs First

“Our government rushed to join international agreements where the United States pays the costs and bears the burdens while other countries get the benefit and pay nothing.” – President Donald J. Trump

ALREADY THE WORLD’S ENERGY LEADER: The United States had already become the leader in cutting CO2 emissions while still leading in oil & gas production.

  • In the United States, energy related carbon dioxide emissions have significantly declined since before the Paris Climate Accord was negotiated, and will continue to decline as a share of worldwide emissions, particularly when compared to other nations such as China and India.
    • The Energy Information Administration’s (EIA) 2017 Annual Energy Outlook reports that, from 2005 to 2016, energy related carbon dioxide emissions fell at an average annual rate of 1.4%.
    • Emissions are projected to continue to fall from 2016 to 2040. 
    • Meanwhile, the EIA reports that emissions in the developing world are expected to double their 2005 levels by 2040.
  • According to recent U.S. Energy Information Administration, the United States remained the world’s top producer of oil and natural gas combined.
  • The United States continues to be a world leader in energy, but increased competition from countries like China demonstrates the need for policies that enable America to compete on a global scale.

HARMFUL TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE: The Paris Climate Accord could cost the United States economy millions of jobs and trillions of dollars in economic output over the next several decades.

  • According to an analysis by National Economic Research Associates (NERA), meeting President Obama’s commitment under the Paris Climate Accord would cost the United States nearly $3 trillion by 2040.
    • By 2040, the American economy could have 6.5 million fewer industrial sector jobs, including 3.1 million fewer manufacturing jobs.
    • Industries such as cement, iron and steel, coal, natural gas, and petroleum would be forced to cut production under President Obama’s Paris Climate Accord.

SHOULDERING THE BURDEN: Under the Paris Climate Accord, the United States would carry the burden while other countries would get the benefits.

  • Under the Obama Administration, which signed an agreement without having to deal with the economic repercussions, the United States was committed to reducing CO2 emissions by between 26 and 28 percent from 2005 levels by 2025.
    • Meanwhile China can continue to increase emissions for the next 13 years.
  • The United States already contributed $1 billion to a UN Green Climate Fund. This would increase to $3 billion under pledges made by the previous Administration.

INEFFECTIVE: Even if every nation fully complied with the Paris Climate Accord, it would barely impact the climate.

  • According to researchers from MIT, if every nation that signed the Paris Climate Accord met all of their commitments until the end of the century, the impact on the climate would be negligible.

PROMISE TO THE AMERICAN PEOPLE: President Trump is fulfilling his promise to the American people to stop international agreements that disadvantage the United States.

  • May 26, 2016, then-candidate Trump:
    • “President Obama entered the United States into the Paris Climate Accords— unilaterally, and without the permission of Congress.”
    • “So foreign bureaucrats are going to be controlling what we are using and what we are doing on our land in our country. No way.”

Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Interesting) by Phoenix666 on Friday June 02 2017, @02:23PM (1 child)

    by Phoenix666 (552) on Friday June 02 2017, @02:23PM (#519362) Journal

    His brand of brittle hubris characterizes much of his class. When a person owes his wealth and position to the old boy network rather than the strength of his own right arm, bluster comprises the totality of his persona. Any challenge to his constructed facade invokes reactions like Trump's. A few of them work hard to justify to themselves the wealth and position they already have, but most spend most of their time and energy to maintaining their place in the old boy network that cares for and feeds them. The rest of us are aphids to be farmed.

    A handful of genuine, self-made unicorns who achieve economic wealth and influence, are regarded as demi-gods; they quickly attract coteries of hangers-on who hope to be considered less worthless by association. If the unicorns spurn those too coarsely, though, the old-boy network turns on them quickly and tries hard to destroy them.

    That was the dynamic at work in Martha Stewart's case. She built her empire of home fashion, but she was nasty to the old boy network. Too many slights at too many cocktail parties. So they used the insider trading affair to take her down, even though that sort of things is universally done among the old boy network.

    --
    Washington DC delenda est.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 03 2017, @06:54PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Saturday June 03 2017, @06:54PM (#519938)

    His brand of brittle hubris characterizes much of his class. When a person owes his wealth and position to the old boy network rather than the strength of his own right arm, bluster comprises the totality of his persona.

    Not even close. His brittle hubris isn't due to the silver spoon in his ass. There are plenty of old money people who aren't like that. You just don't hear from them because they aren't so insecure to they have to bluster. I've met plenty of similar assholes who aren't rich and plenty of rich people who weren't pathetic losers as people. His paranoid insecurity is a character defect that money amplifies. Maybe it is genetic or maybe his dickhole of a father and smothering mother made him that way, but money did not cause it.

    As for martha stewart, lolwut? She lost a fight with other billionaires. That wasn't about her being mouthy. It was just another power struggle between titans.