SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
New Jersey Spotlight reports
Three Mile Island may be the next nuclear power plant to be shuttered by its owner unless it gets financial help to keep the facility afloat.
Exelon Corp., the owner of the Pennsylvania generating station, announced yesterday it will retire the plant by or about September 30, 2019 absent any change in that state's policies dealing with nuclear power.
The announcement is the latest by an owner of a nuclear plant to threaten or close its facility unless given financial assistance to make the facility profitable, a drama that could play out soon in New Jersey with its three nuclear units operated by the Public Service Enterprise Group in South Jersey.
If Exelon follows through on its threat, it would mean the Oyster Creek plant in Lacey Township, also owned by the Chicago energy giant, could outlast TMI, the site of the nation's biggest nuclear accident when it had a partial meltdown in 1979.
Oyster Creek, the country's oldest commercial nuclear plant, agreed to shut down at the end of 2019 under a settlement worked out with the Christie administration in 2010.
[...] Environmentalists oppose extending the incentives renewable sources obtain to nuclear, because unlike solar, wind, and water, the former is not sustainable. “It’s not renewable; you have to keep buying the fuel,’’ said Jeff Tittel, director of the New Jersey Sierra Club.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 04 2017, @03:17PM (1 child)
Increasing the efficiency of nuclear does not make it suddenly a renewable energy source. Breeder reactors don't break the law of conservation of energy.
You pay for that efficiency with products that not only need to be processed before usage, but can also be weaponized. Think of the implications there if nuclear ever became common. You'd have hundreds (thousands?) of potential targets that would require regular military level protection with inconceivable potential for terrorism both of the plant itself, and of its plutonium product. That's simply not realistic. Even if it did happen the costs would be through the roof. Spend less on the uranium and then spend a billion times more on security and contingencies.
(Score: 1) by khallow on Monday June 05 2017, @12:25AM