SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the is-there-a-solution-that-is-less-bad-than-the-problem? dept.
If it seems like every week, there's another terrorist attack – well, you're not wrong. According to one crowdsourcing map, there have been over 500 attacks around the world since the start of 2017, with over 3,500 fatalities. For a period in 2016, ISIS-initiated attacks were occurring, on average, every 84 hours.
Despite improvements in methods and coordination among law enforcement agencies over the past 25 years, they're still hamstrung in a number of ways. With large public gatherings of people becoming more attractive targets for terrorists, what are the best strategies moving forward?
[...] But despite huge budgets and the presence of thousands of added security personnel, it's virtually impossible to prevent a determined terrorist, or guarantee absolute safety. While security efforts for events like the Olympic Games have escalated, terrorists today no longer wait for major events that draw global interest.
[...] The odds are in favor of terrorists. All they have to do is succeed once, no matter how many times they try. For public safety professionals to be fully successful, they have to prevent 100 percent of the terror attempts. It's a number to aspire to, but even the most experienced countries fighting terror – such as Israel and the U.K. – can't measure up to this standard.
[...] These days, it's necessary to consider any place where crowds congregate as vulnerable "soft targets" for the attackers. To better prepare for securing soft targets (and this isn't to say threats against "hard targets," like planes, buildings and infrastructure, have diminished) law enforcement agencies must improve coordination among one another, whether it's via intelligence, information sharing and training. And then there's the need for deconfliction, which refers to avoiding self-defeating behavior – from interagency rivalries and poor communication to insufficient coordination – by people who are on the same side.
[...] Given that there is no way to guarantee complete safety, and that the threat assessment expects more attacks, there are two more elements that ought to receive more attention: community resilience and community policing.
https://theconversation.com/how-can-we-better-protect-crowds-from-terrorism-78443
[Related]:
1996 Atlanta Olympic Games: https://www.britannica.com/event/Atlanta-Olympic-Games-bombing-of-1996
Secure Airport Design: https://skift.com/2016/07/04/how-smart-airport-design-can-make-spaces-more-secure/
Do you agree with this assessment of the security situation ? What do you think could be done to mitigate the effects of such asymmetric warfare ?
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Monday June 05 2017, @12:00AM (1 child)
That's an exaggeration. There's huge numbers of people in Africa being displaced by wars there that have nothing to do with the US. The US never really had colonies in Africa. Liberia is the closest that I can think of and that's a pretty small country and ultimately gained independence without any sort of war.
The ones your thinking about are mostly in the middle east and the violence is as much because of what the US has done as the tensions between the various factions and ethnic groups.
(Score: 2) by Phoenix666 on Monday June 05 2017, @11:46AM
Yes, it's fashionable now to make everything all America's fault, no matter what, no matter where. But in modern history there was already a lot of tension from Ottoman rule (that's what Lawrence of Arabia was all about), and then post-WWI colonization by France and Britain; France, which took Lebanon and Syria, and Britain, which took Palestine and Jordan (names and exact boundaries have changed, but that's roughly it in current terms). Then before that you have the tensions caused by Byzantine rule, the Crusades, Roman oppression, Macedonian hegemony, Persian rule, Hittite invasion, Babylonian attrocity, and those total fuckers, the Chaldeans. There are many more interstitial empires and oppressors in that timespan, but that should suffice to remind everyone on the "Hate on America" train that that region has never been anything but a clusterfuck.
It also ought to persuade anyone, even the most ardent hippie, that even another thousand years would not bring civilization and peace to a region that has stubbornly refused them for 7,000 years (at least). There is a saying that is apt here: "If they do not know by now, it is because they refuse to learn."
Washington DC delenda est.