Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Tuesday June 06 2017, @11:18PM   Printer-friendly
from the standardized-formats dept.

U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs (DVA) secretary David Shulkin announced a major overhaul of the department's Electronic Health Records (EHR) systems.

The department will scrap its in-house developed EHR systems, known as VistA in favor of MHS GENESIS, the EHR system in use by the U.S. Department of Defense.

MHS GENESIS is based on the Cerner Millenium API. For those of you who will ask, no, Cerner Millenium is *not* open source.

VistA, the current DVA system was originally conceived as a "paperless" health records management system in the early 1970s, developed and implemented by DVA and other government agencies, both in the United States and in a number of other countries including Finland, Egypt and Germany. VistA is in the public domain

So what say you, Soylentils? Does it make sense to throw out decades of development on a platform both widely used and in the public domain? Should the government be doing its own software development?

Are you a government contractor doing software development? If so, how might this and/or similar actions affect you?

Other Coverage:
White House press briefing/announcement from Secretary Shulkin
Healthcare IT News
Defense One [behind script wall]
Kansas City Star
FCW


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1) by rider_prider on Wednesday June 07 2017, @04:50PM (1 child)

    by rider_prider (5146) on Wednesday June 07 2017, @04:50PM (#522052)

    Important to note that nearly all 'modern' medical systems are based on the old MUMP's architecture, basically just closed source versions of the VA system. This is a lost opportunity for us all. If any system should be fully free and open source it's this.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 07 2017, @05:21PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 07 2017, @05:21PM (#522075)

    yep, spending tax dollars on closed source should be illegal as you are using the people's money on something they won't own and therefore won't fully benefit from, while simultaneously lining the pockets of the dev/dev company. if you can't spend everyone's money on something that will benefit everyone then you just can't have that money because your precious socialism isn't working for that particular situation. it's just like the school teacher who says that if you didn't bring a cookie for everyone then you can't eat cookies in class, wittingly/unwittingly teaching socialism/communism/some ism(i never read those books. so i only pick up little pieces of propaganda from all sides like most americans/the world?). this should be obvious but people think it's patriotic to buy from what should be considered national embarrassments(except for their biz skillz, which are quite l33t, i'm sure) like apple and ms.