Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by on Thursday June 08 2017, @06:06PM   Printer-friendly
from the think-of-the-children dept.

In a maximum security mental health facility in Montreal is a "cave-like" virtual reality vault that's used to show images of child sexual abuse to sex offenders. Patients sit inside the vault with devices placed around their penises to measure signs of arousal as they are shown computer-generated animations of naked children.

"We do develop pornography, but these images and animations are not used for the pleasure of the patient but to assess them," said Patrice Renaud, who heads up the project at the Institut Philippe-Pinel. "It's a bit like using a polygraph but with other measurement techniques."

The system, combined with other psychological assessments, is used to build up a profile of the individual's sexual preferences that can be used by the court to determine the risk they pose to society and by mental health professionals to determine treatment.

[...] The patients sit on a stool inside the chamber wearing stereoscopic glasses which create the three-dimensional effect on the surrounding walls. The glasses are fitted with eye-tracking technology to ensure they aren't trying to trick the system by avoiding looking at the critical content.

Source: The Guardian


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Thursday June 08 2017, @06:23PM (7 children)

    by bob_super (1357) on Thursday June 08 2017, @06:23PM (#522718)

    What is the added value of VR, in the process of asserting excitement?

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: -1, Flamebait) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 08 2017, @06:58PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 08 2017, @06:58PM (#522740)

    Good point. A simple bullet to the base of the skull would offer a more certain and cost-effective "treatment" for this lot.

  • (Score: 2) by DannyB on Thursday June 08 2017, @07:06PM

    by DannyB (5839) Subscriber Badge on Thursday June 08 2017, @07:06PM (#522744) Journal

    Because it just does. Can't you understand? Because technology. VR sprinkles the pixie dust of credibility and respectability. Emit a tachyon pulse with modulated frequency and inverted polarity.

    Back in the day, if those numbers came out of the line printer on green and white striped pinfeed paper, then it is absolutely gospel truth! No matter how incompetent the programmer whose idiot program calculated those numbers.

    --
    To transfer files: right-click on file, pick Copy. Unplug mouse, plug mouse into other computer. Right-click, paste.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 08 2017, @07:15PM (4 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 08 2017, @07:15PM (#522750)

    What is the added value of VR, in the process of asserting excitement?

    Almost certainly to avoid problems with non-virtual kiddy porn (assuming Canada has similar laws as in the USA). While any trace of real-world kiddy porn is a risk for the cops to bust down your door and drag you away (don't talk to strange links!), virtual kiddy porn is "protected speech" ala "art".

    • (Score: 4, Interesting) by kaszz on Thursday June 08 2017, @10:40PM (3 children)

      by kaszz (4211) on Thursday June 08 2017, @10:40PM (#522827) Journal

      In France, virtual child porn is forbidden. And in the US the law says that any realistic appearing computer generated depiction that is indistinguishable from a depiction of an actual minor in sexual situations or engaging in sexual acts is illegal under 18 U.S.C. ยง 2252A. The Australian state of Victoria also seems to have some screwed laws.

      This is borderline thought crime. Just consider that if you wrote a formula that produced a illegal picture, would that be illegal to write it on a blackboard? and in any case you may not plot what the formula because the resulting output would be illegal. And if you would think of it, now is that illegal?

      • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 08 2017, @10:57PM

        by Anonymous Coward on Thursday June 08 2017, @10:57PM (#522831)

        If a machine learning algorithm creates a realistic appearing computer generated depiction of a nude minor, who gets arrested?

      • (Score: 2) by linuxrocks123 on Friday June 09 2017, @03:17AM

        by linuxrocks123 (2557) on Friday June 09 2017, @03:17AM (#522922) Journal

        Re US law: computer-generated child pornography is only illegal if it's also obscene. There was a Supreme Court case on this, Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition.

        This is not a trivial distinction: obscenity under US law is very strictly defined, and it is very hard to get a court to find something with any artistic component whatsoever to be legally obscene. The US may have its faults, but we're serious about our free speech.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 09 2017, @07:57AM

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 09 2017, @07:57AM (#522973)

        In France, virtual child porn is forbidden

        Which sends a loud and clear message that molesting a child and taking pictures of it is just as bad as molesting a pencil.