Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 17 submissions in the queue.
posted by n1 on Friday June 09 2017, @12:15AM   Printer-friendly
from the kill-'em-all dept.

Gerrymandering has a long and unpopular history in the United States. It is the main reason that the country ranked 55th of 158 nations — last among Western democracies — in a 2017 index of voting fairness run by the Electoral Integrity Project

[...] Lawsuits fighting partisan gerrymandering are pending around the country, and a census planned for 2020 is expected to trigger nationwide redistricting. If the mathematicians succeed in laying out their case, it could influence how those maps are drawn.

[...] States such as Arizona and Iowa, which have independent or bipartisan commissions that oversee the creation of voting districts, fared much better. In a separate analysis, Daniel McGlone, a geographic-information-system data analyst at the technology firm Azavea in Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, ranked each state’s voting districts for compactness as a measure of gerrymandering, and found that Maryland had the most-gerrymandered districts. North Carolina came second. Nevada, Nebraska and Indiana were the least gerrymandered.

[...] In the summer of 2016, a bipartisan panel of retired judges met to see whether they could create a more representative set of voting districts for North Carolina. Their maps gave Mattingly a chance to test his index. The judges’ districts, he found, were less gerrymandered than in 75% of the computer-generated models — a sign of a well-drawn, representative map. By comparison, every one of the 24,000 computer-drawn districts was less gerrymandered than either the 2012 or 2016 voting districts drawn by state legislators

[...] Political scientist Nicholas Stephanopoulos at the University of Chicago, Illinois, takes a much simpler approach to measuring gerrymandering. He has developed what he calls an “efficiency gap”, which measures a state’s wasted votes: all those cast for a losing candidate in each district, and all those for the victor in excess of the proportion needed to win. If one party has lots of landslide victories and crushing losses compared with its rivals, this can be a sign of gerrymandering.

Note: Please try to keep the discussion on the topic of gerrymandering.

http://www.nature.com/news/the-mathematicians-who-want-to-save-democracy-1.22113
https://arxiv.org/abs/1410.8796


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Friday June 09 2017, @01:04AM (1 child)

    by bob_super (1357) on Friday June 09 2017, @01:04AM (#522879)

    The point of gerrymandering is to tinker with actual proportional representation.
    The positive side is to allow minority representation, if desired.
    The negative side is everything else, primarily getting an undue advantage by grouping or diluting the opponent's voters.

    Turns out that proportional elections systems (rather than first-past-the-post) avoid that problem altogether, a bit like popular vote avoids the distortions of the electoral college system.
    But proportional elections do often result in difficult governance. Multiple countries are considering a mix of proportional and direct elections, to try to mitigate the issue.

    No black and white answer on this one, except that letting politicos draw their districts is pretty much always a terrible idea.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Friday June 09 2017, @10:51PM

    by FatPhil (863) <{pc-soylent} {at} {asdf.fi}> on Friday June 09 2017, @10:51PM (#523313) Homepage
    Everything else of course being 100 times the never-achieved benehttp://www.cgpgrey.com/blog/gerrymandering-explained.html
    --
    Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves