Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Saturday June 10 2017, @11:24PM   Printer-friendly
from the ethanol-fueled-kaiju-killers dept.

Over a year after signalling its intentions to dump the robotics demonstration company Boston Dynamics, Alphabet/Google has finally found a buyer: SoftBank. SoftBank acquired ARM Holdings for around $32 billion in 2016. Google also offloaded another robotics company, Schaft:

Google's ambitions for Boston Dynamics were never really clear. Before being acquired, the robotics company was mostly funded by DARPA—the US military's research division—with the express purpose of creating militarised robots. Within a year of being picked up, though, Google announced that it would no longer pursue any DARPA contracts, presumably to focus on possible commercial uses for the bots. No commercial robots ever emerged.

SoftBank, however, has had success with commercialising robots—specifically the small humanoid robot Pepper.

Also at The Verge, The Guardian, TNW, CNN, CNBC, and TechCrunch.

Previously: Pentagon Scientists Show Off Robot And Prosthetics
Google's Noisy "BigDog" Robot Fails to Impress U.S. Marine Corps
Google's Latest Boston Dynamics Robot Takes a Stand
Boston Dynamics Produces a Wheeled Terror as Google Watches Nervously


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 11 2017, @07:02AM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Sunday June 11 2017, @07:02AM (#523716)

    Boston Dynamics should never have been acquired by anybody. If it has to be owned, the logical choices are:

    General Dynamics
    Lockheed Martin
    Northrop Grumman
    Raytheon
    Boeing
    GE
    Caterpillar
    BAE
    iRobot

    Buying the company, avoiding military contracts, directing them to do cute battery-powered things with wheels, and then selling them off to a non-US company... that just shows contempt for America.

  • (Score: 2) by takyon on Sunday June 11 2017, @10:51AM

    by takyon (881) <reversethis-{gro ... s} {ta} {noykat}> on Sunday June 11 2017, @10:51AM (#523753) Journal

    Better than making robots with contempt for Americans.

    --
    [SIG] 10/28/2017: Soylent Upgrade v14 [soylentnews.org]
  • (Score: 2) by kaszz on Sunday June 11 2017, @01:43PM

    by kaszz (4211) on Sunday June 11 2017, @01:43PM (#523804) Journal

    SpaceX ?

  • (Score: 1) by Ethanol-fueled on Monday June 12 2017, @12:22AM

    by Ethanol-fueled (2792) on Monday June 12 2017, @12:22AM (#524045) Homepage

    Exactly. Good defense contractors, despite their often-boneheaded mistakes, know they have to make money and have well-paid teams of industry experts thoroughly evaluate all potential acquisitions. In case you're wondering why such an awesome startup was never acquired by real defense contractors, you should ask yourself why bipedal Metal Gear-style robots haven't been implemented yet -- they're ridiculously complicated with more moving parts (which are points of failure) and can be tripped and tied up with strong-enough cable. Sure, they look really cool, but they're fresh-meat in combat situations.

    Boston Dynamics developed those machines because they could, machines for their own sake. Definitely valuable from a research standpoint, ridiculous from an applications standpoint.