SoylentNews is people
SoylentNews
from the give-me-six-lines-penned-by-the-most-honest-of-men... dept.
Cracked Labs has just released a report on Corporate Surveillance in Everyday Life:
Report: How thousands of companies monitor, analyze, and influence the lives of billions. Who are the main players in today's digital tracking? What can they infer from our purchases, phone calls, web searches, and Facebook likes? How do online platforms, tech companies, and data brokers collect, trade, and make use of personal data?
In recent years, a wide range of companies has started to monitor, track and follow people in virtually every aspect of their lives. The behaviors, movements, social relationships, interests, weaknesses and most private moments of billions are now constantly recorded, evaluated and analyzed in real-time. The exploitation of personal information has become a multi-billion industry. Yet only the tip of the iceberg of today's pervasive digital tracking is visible; much of it occurs in the background and remains opaque to most of us.
This report by Cracked Labs examines the actual practices and inner workings of this personal data industry. Based on years of research and a previous 2016 report, the investigation shines light on the hidden data flows between companies. It maps the structure and scope of today's digital tracking and profiling ecosystems and explores relevant technologies, platforms and devices, as well as key recent developments.
While the full report is available as PDF download, this web publication presents a ten part overview.
The online paper has 10 sections on everything from "Analyzing People" through "Towards a society of pervasive digital social control?"
In short, these companies are relying on information asymmetry — they know what they are getting and what they plan on doing with data about you, while you are left to your limited imagination as to what they might be planning.
(Score: 2) by kaszz on Monday June 12 2017, @09:21PM
People face real world consequences for transgressing corporate agenda. Not really for being abusive towards other people. And that is the problem. Corporations have no place in policing social forums with a corporate agenda as a basis.
Not using the real name is a necessity because too many people are bullies by nature or let their vested interest expand like a damp cloth over everybody else if they get a chance. But maybe a maturity limit would be a good thing to implement. In the past it existed in the form of the need to be technically qualified which necessitated some minimum thinking and curiosity capability. Let people install the OS on their computer phones themselves and it may solve a lot of modern day bullshit..