Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 16 submissions in the queue.
posted by martyb on Wednesday June 14 2017, @02:25AM   Printer-friendly
from the make-backups...-and-test-them dept.

Earth has been hit by objects in the past, with devastating effects. Scientists largely agree that it was an asteroid or comet impact that started the chain of events that wiped out the dinosaurs around 60 million years ago.

[...] impacts from objects in space are just one of several ways that humanity and most of life on Earth could suddenly disappear.

We are already observing that extinctions are happening now at an unprecedented rate. In 2014 it was estimated that the extinction rate is now 1,000 times greater than before humans were on the Earth. The estimated number of extinctions ranges from 200 to 2,000 species per year.

From all of this very worrying data, it would not be a stretch to say that we are currently within a doomsday scenario. Of course, the “day” is longer than 24 hours but may be instead in the order of a century or two.

So what can we do about this potential prospect of impending doom?

[...] But the threats we face are so unpredictable that we need to have a backup plan. We need to plan for the time after our doomsday and think about how a post-apocalyptic Earth may recover and humanity will flourish again.

How to backup life on Earth

As computer experts, you are familiar with backup plans. What should we do to backup human survival ?


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Touché) by kaszz on Wednesday June 14 2017, @03:48AM

    by kaszz (4211) on Wednesday June 14 2017, @03:48AM (#525249) Journal

    1/ they are closer; and therefore easier to support. Eventually they will be self sustaining; and thus a true colony rather then a "satellite" colony.

    If shit happens they are also more likely to be snuffed out. And then there's the radiation issue. LEO is not really "true space" and outside of it is hard to protect. So underground on a planet makes sense.

    2/ since they are easier to support; they can be built and deployed much faster and on a bigger scale then any Mars mission.

    Easy come but hard to protect.

    3/ they offer very similar benefits to having a Mars colony without so much of the associated costs.

    The cost just shows up somewhere else. No easy soil or ice to play around with for starters.

    4/ perfecting a "spinning for gravity" habitat is also practice for long duration star ship travel; artificial gravity may be possible but it isn't happening anytime soon.

    This is probably something needed.

    5/ though bringing asteroids to Earth orbit for mining is probably dangerous getting the proceeds to back to market will be easier and cheaper.

    Bring them to the moon. Less shit that happens if it crashes and it will still be near enough.

    6/ we already know that processing materials in micro-gravity enables special properties to manifest; having an orbital colony and eventually manufacturing base will enable a whole range of novel materials to be produced.

    Yes, that is definitely something worthwhile to look into. Though so far no really profitable business scenario have shown up. The real break is a off-Earth industrial base re-supplied solely using space resources.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Touché=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Touché' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3