Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Friday June 16 2017, @05:22AM   Printer-friendly
from the he-said-penetrated dept.

Russia's cyberattack on the U.S. electoral system before Donald Trump's election was far more widespread than has been publicly revealed, including incursions into voter databases and software systems in almost twice as many states as previously reported.

In Illinois, investigators found evidence that cyber intruders tried to delete or alter voter data. The hackers accessed software designed to be used by poll workers on Election Day, and in at least one state accessed a campaign finance database. Details of the wave of attacks, in the summer and fall of 2016, were provided by three people with direct knowledge of the U.S. investigation into the matter. In all, the Russian hackers hit systems in a total of 39 states, one of them said.

[...] The new details, buttressed by a classified National Security Agency document recently disclosed by The Intercept, show the scope of alleged hacking that federal investigators are scrutinizing as they look into whether Trump campaign officials may have colluded in the efforts. But they also paint a worrisome picture for future elections: The newest portrayal of potentially deep vulnerabilities in the U.S.'s patchwork of voting technologies comes less than a week after former FBI Director James Comey warned Congress that Moscow isn't done meddling.

https://www.bloomberg.com/politics/articles/2017-06-13/russian-breach-of-39-states-threatens-future-u-s-elections


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: -1, Redundant) by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 16 2017, @06:49AM (8 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 16 2017, @06:49AM (#526344)

    You have a group of people doubting this because the foreign thumb happened to be pressing down on their side's scale.

    Or doubting it because there's no actual evidence of vote tampering and the 8 states without a paper trail will have one next time around. Meanwhile another group of people doubt illegals voted despite their being actual evidence. Makes you think.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   -1  
       Redundant=1, Informative=1, Overrated=1, Total=3
    Extra 'Redundant' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   -1  
  • (Score: 2, Informative) by Lagg on Friday June 16 2017, @07:51AM (3 children)

    by Lagg (105) on Friday June 16 2017, @07:51AM (#526358) Homepage Journal

    God for a tech site that loves 1984 you guys really can be dumb bastards sometimes.

    --
    http://lagg.me [lagg.me] 🗿
    • (Score: 5, Insightful) by Wootery on Friday June 16 2017, @09:27AM (2 children)

      by Wootery (2341) on Friday June 16 2017, @09:27AM (#526377)

      Thing is, the dumb bullshit on this site is damn near always posted as AC. It's almost as if they know they're writing bullshit.

      • (Score: 2, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 16 2017, @12:07PM (1 child)

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 16 2017, @12:07PM (#526401)

        Thing is, the dumb bullshit on this site is damn near always posted as AC. It's almost as if they know they're writing bullshit.

        Let's see what TFA says:

        One of the mysteries about the 2016 presidential election is why Russian intelligence, after gaining access to state and local systems, didn’t try to disrupt the vote.

        Translation: "no vote tampering". Everyone knowledgable has been ragging on electronic voting since it was first introduced, yet for some reason there are still 8 states without a paper trail. If you want to protect the sanctity of the electoral system, you must prevent non-citizens from voting. [washingtontimes.com]

        If "dumb bullshit is always posted as AC", you should login more often. The rest of us are fine.

        • (Score: 2) by Lagg on Friday June 16 2017, @06:55PM

          by Lagg (105) on Friday June 16 2017, @06:55PM (#526568) Homepage Journal

          Heh, sanctity of the electoral system? Where have you been for the last decade you silly goose. Also, AZ is one of these states [thinkprogress.org]. I can tell you right now they have no reason whatsoever as a republican state to do that. They're just corrupt and disorganized. Another truth murika doesn't like facing and is easier to blame muh illegals and muh aliums and muh murslims on.

          By the way, related to my above post and speaking of little bitches: Trump made the ultimate bitch move of deflecting the burden of firing someone onto his employees. And people think he's a businessman? He a lil' bitch

          P.S. I don't like border hopping either. Illegal entrants need to settle their due at some point. But I am not going to fucking be upset by 1.8K people voting out of millions. When those millions have no better knowledge or competency than the illegal entrant in question.

          God, you guys suck at your own articles because you overreach whenever that fear shit starts running down your legs.

          --
          http://lagg.me [lagg.me] 🗿
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 16 2017, @03:37PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 16 2017, @03:37PM (#526471)

    Can't blame them for trying though. If the Russians had paid off Mexico to move from being a semi-fucked up US satellite, to being a semi-fucked up Russian satellite, the US would be hopping mad and take over Cabo San Lucas.

    Or just regime change the Mexican presidency.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 16 2017, @04:07PM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 16 2017, @04:07PM (#526486)

    Meanwhile another group of people doubt illegals voted despite their being actual evidence.

    Citation needed. And neither stormfront nor breitbart will cut it, I'm afraid.

    Makes you think.

    Yeah, I'm thinking a whole lot of things right now. Care to guess what some of those thoughts might be?

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 16 2017, @11:15PM (1 child)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 16 2017, @11:15PM (#526674)

      Yeah! You tell him, Liberal Champion of the Oppressed! That guy needs to provide evidence, but all websites are disqualified if you don't like them! That's how you win an argument! Automatic disregard of anyone you don't like, regardless of the evidence! Soros loves you!

      • (Score: 2) by J053 on Saturday June 17 2017, @01:07AM

        by J053 (3532) <{dakine} {at} {shangri-la.cx}> on Saturday June 17 2017, @01:07AM (#526720) Homepage

        Just what in the actual fuck is the cause of the hardon so many on the right have for George Soros? OK, he started MoveOn.org - so what? He's just some moderately-wealty dude who has decided to spend some of his money on political advocacy, but to hear the righties tell it, he's a Nazi Collaborator (he was 15 in 1945) who is striving for world domination. Kinda like a bunch of folks on the left feel about Sheldon Adelson and the Kochs.

        I'm frankly more concerned about Robert Mercer and his influence via Steve Bannon and Kellyanne Conway (and others) on the upper reaches of the US Government, but what do I know?