Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Monday June 19 2017, @11:13PM   Printer-friendly
from the think-of-the-children dept.

We see smartphones everywhere. In school hallways, at the family dinner table and plugged in at the bedside table.

But how young is too young to be constantly connected to the rest of the world through sleek apps, social media and video messaging?

One Colorado man has decided that age 13 seems like a good cutoff.

Tim Farnum is leading the charge on a proposed ballot initiative in Colorado that would be the first of its kind in the country. Farnum's proposal would ban the sale of smartphones to children younger than 13, or more likely, to parents who intend to give the smartphone to kids in that age bracket.

Farnum, a Denver-area anesthesiologist, is the founder of Parents Against Underage Smartphones, or PAUS, the nonprofit group pushing the proposal.

Source: Coloradoan.com

Also reported by: The Washington Post

Initial Fiscal Impact Statement: Colorado.gov [PDF]


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2, Insightful) by Revek on Tuesday June 20 2017, @12:23AM (7 children)

    by Revek (5022) on Tuesday June 20 2017, @12:23AM (#528233)

    I'm betting he wants 8 tracks to make a comeback to.

    --
    This page was generated by a Swarm of Roaming Elephants
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 20 2017, @12:34AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 20 2017, @12:34AM (#528245)

    Those made great stashboxes for important things, they even played a short loop of music.

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 20 2017, @12:43AM (5 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 20 2017, @12:43AM (#528253)

    Pandora sucks and 8 tracks are better because you don't have to buffer an 8 track.

    • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 20 2017, @02:06AM (4 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 20 2017, @02:06AM (#528289)

      Spoken like somebody who has never used an 8-tack.

      It has a tape loop. If you stop mid tape, you have to wait for the "beginning" to come around again.

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 20 2017, @02:11AM (3 children)

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 20 2017, @02:11AM (#528294)

        Oh no my internet connection is slow today so my 8 track player is experiencing interruptions, said nobody ever.

        • (Score: 2) by KGIII on Tuesday June 20 2017, @03:06PM (2 children)

          by KGIII (5261) on Tuesday June 20 2017, @03:06PM (#528475) Journal

          Not true. You just said it. Sheesh.

          --
          "So long and thanks for all the fish."
          • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 20 2017, @10:55PM (1 child)

            by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday June 20 2017, @10:55PM (#528759)

            ............
            I bet you sell pitchforks on reddit

            • (Score: 2) by KGIII on Wednesday June 21 2017, @01:06AM

              by KGIII (5261) on Wednesday June 21 2017, @01:06AM (#528821) Journal

              Good idea.

              --
              "So long and thanks for all the fish."