Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday June 21 2017, @02:10PM   Printer-friendly
from the bye-bye dept.

The New York Times reports:

Travis Kalanick stepped down Tuesday as chief executive of Uber, the ride-hailing service that he helped found in 2009 and built into a transportation colossus, after a shareholder revolt made it untenable for him to stay on at the company.

Mr. Kalanick's exit came under pressure after hours of drama involving Uber's investors, according to two people with knowledge of the situation, who asked to remain anonymous because the details were confidential.

Earlier on Tuesday, five of Uber's major investors demanded that the chief executive resign immediately. The investors included one of Uber's biggest shareholders, the venture capital firm Benchmark, which has one of its partners, Bill Gurley, on Uber's board. The investors made their demand for Mr. Kalanick to step down in a letter delivered to the chief executive while he was in Chicago, said the people with knowledge of the situation.

[...] Mr. Kalanick's troubles began earlier this year after a former Uber engineer detailed what she said was sexual harassment at the company, opening the floodgates for more complaints and spurring internal investigations. In addition, Uber has been dealing with an intellectual property lawsuit from Waymo, the self-driving car business that operates under Google's parent company, and a federal inquiry into a software tool that Uber used to sidestep some law enforcement.

Uber has been trying to move past its difficult history, which has grown inextricably tied to Mr. Kalanick. In recent months, Uber has fired more than 20 employees after an investigation into the company's culture, embarked on major changes to professionalize its workplace, and is searching for new executives including a chief operating officer.

According to The Register:

Kalanick led Uber into fights on many fronts. The company had a strategy of entering markets without regard to regulation, earning it lawsuits all over the world. During one such lawsuit, Uber breached privacy laws. The company also stands accused of stealing self-driving car technology and deliberately targeting government officials who sought to investigate it.

The BBC notes:

Surely the most dramatic fall from grace the start-up world has ever seen, a scalp so big it will have chief executives across this city sitting bolt upright, and thinking: "If Travis can get booted out of Uber... no-one is safe."

What started out as a PR inconvenience has left the company without, to name just a few, a chief executive officer, chief operating officer, chief technology officer and chief financial officer. Uber is in tatters, engulfed by its own aggression.

Mr Kalanick embodied his company's prevailing attitude: success at all costs. It saw Uber dominate the ride-sharing world, his chutzpah enabling the company to attract investment so effectively that last year Uber alone raised more money than the entire UK start-up scene.

But in doing so he didn't play fair. He created a company that deceived local regulators, neglected the well-being of employees, wound-up drivers, troubled investors, obtained a rape victim's medical records and allegedly stole trade secrets from a rival.

See also: c|net


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by goodie on Wednesday June 21 2017, @04:12PM (1 child)

    by goodie (1877) on Wednesday June 21 2017, @04:12PM (#529074) Journal

    While I absolutely hate the idea of Uber as some sort of corporation that encourages the skirting of tax laws and uses a compensation model that will only hurt people in the long run (and have never used them), as others have pointed out, it has grown a lot in a very short period of time. My personal opinion, in those cases, if that you have to be a douche to be successful. Not that you necessarily want to, but to achieve these objectives you cannot stop at details. And yes, when you have millions of rides taking place every day across the world, allegations of assault and so on are a detail. They can hurt your image, but from an operational standpoint, they are outliers. Sure you will try to address them, but only because people make you. If you start to rethink your model because of those outliers, you compromise the trajectory that you have set for your company. This is even worse considering that up until it hurt them, shareholders were probably more than happy to have those brushed under the rug in hope that they would be quickly forgotten.

    So Kalanick is probably a dick (no limerick intended). But it's not surprising, we have countless examples in the corporate world. Perhaps the big difference is that Uber has human employees and customers, unlike corporations like Oracle who have employees but whose customers are corporate (not a very high probability of sexual assault here...). My point is that it was bound to happen. And it will happen with the next big tech thing. People don't bother with the details and the sense of entitlement that comes with the big job sure does not help.

    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2  
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by Gaaark on Wednesday June 21 2017, @04:28PM

    by Gaaark (41) on Wednesday June 21 2017, @04:28PM (#529090) Journal

    I still picture the corporate guy from Mr. Robot (the one that used KDE) going out and beating the sh!t out of the homeless guy because 'he can'.

    Wonder if that is based on anyone they know, or just the sociopath executives in general.

    --
    --- Please remind me if I haven't been civil to you: I'm channeling MDC. ---Gaaark 2.0 ---