Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by n1 on Friday June 23 2017, @02:45AM   Printer-friendly
from the shooting-range dept.

Submitted via IRC for TheMightyBuzzard

A sniper with Canada’s elite special forces in Iraq has shattered the world record for the longest confirmed kill shot in military history at a staggering distance of 3,540 metres.

The Canadian Armed Forces confirmed Thursday that a member of Joint Task Force 2 made the record-breaking shot, killing an Islamic State insurgent during an operation in Iraq within the last month.

[...] The elite sniper was using a McMillan TAC-50 sniper rifle while firing from a high-rise during an operation that took place within the last month in Iraq. It took under 10 seconds to hit the target.

[...] The military source said the JTF2 operation fell within the strictures of the government’s advise and assist mission.

[...] The kill was independently verified by video camera and other data, The Globe and Mail has learned.

[...] The skill of the JTF2 sniper in taking down an insurgent at 3,540 metres required math skills, great eyesight, precision of ammunition and firearms, and superb training.

Not our typical fare but the physics involved in making that shot are crazy.

Source: The Globe and Mail


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Insightful) by KGIII on Friday June 23 2017, @02:55AM (24 children)

    by KGIII (5261) on Friday June 23 2017, @02:55AM (#529780) Journal

    This new record is the second time a Canadian has taken the record. It's a morbid record but quite a feat.

    --
    "So long and thanks for all the fish."
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Insightful=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Insightful' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 3, Informative) by jmorris on Friday June 23 2017, @03:40AM (8 children)

    by jmorris (4844) on Friday June 23 2017, @03:40AM (#529803)

    Chart I saw had Canadian, Brit, Canadian, Canadian, American for the top five. America better up its game if we are going to #MAGA. Not that it isn't great to see the top five all be allies and friends, but a little friendly rivalry is useful.

    • (Score: 3, Funny) by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 23 2017, @04:11AM (5 children)

      by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 23 2017, @04:11AM (#529820)

      America better up its game if we are going to #MAGA.

      With a single orange target worth hitting, not much opportunity to practice.

      • (Score: 2, Flamebait) by Bot on Friday June 23 2017, @04:34AM (2 children)

        by Bot (3902) on Friday June 23 2017, @04:34AM (#529832) Journal

        Had anybody made the same comment about $OLD_POTUS this site would have been shut down.
        Nice to see your country is returning to normalcy.

        --
        Account abandoned.
        • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 23 2017, @01:58PM

          by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 23 2017, @01:58PM (#530014)

          No, no, no. If you want to have power over $OLD_POTUS, you need to use his Real Name, not just a pointer/reference. You need to call him Baraq Hussein Soetoro.

          In fact, perhaps EF's invocation of his True Name has been what kept the site from being shut down!

          If that doesn't work, just shout NEE! at them a few times.

        • (Score: 2) by DeathMonkey on Friday June 23 2017, @07:39PM

          by DeathMonkey (1380) on Friday June 23 2017, @07:39PM (#530197) Journal

          Had anybody made the same comment about $OLD_POTUS this site would have been shut down.

          Either that, or we'd have been invited to the whitehouse: Former Trump adviser who called for Clinton to be shot attends White House bill signing [thehill.com]

      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 23 2017, @05:16AM (1 child)

        by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 23 2017, @05:16AM (#529845)

        Mitch McConnell, Paul Ryan and Nancy Pelosi are avid deer hunters?

        • (Score: 2) by c0lo on Friday June 23 2017, @10:00AM

          by c0lo (156) Subscriber Badge on Friday June 23 2017, @10:00AM (#529938) Journal

          I don't know, did they escape a Vietnamese prison of war camp?

          --
          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aoFiw2jMy-0 https://soylentnews.org/~MichaelDavidCrawford
    • (Score: 2) by KGIII on Friday June 23 2017, @04:17AM (1 child)

      by KGIII (5261) on Friday June 23 2017, @04:17AM (#529826) Journal

      Yup. The Canadians have been doing well. The last record they had, held for a while. Then a Brit took it. As I have citizenship in both the US and in CAN, I am okay with them being in the lead. Long distance shooting is pretty hard. This is an impressive feat, as are all the feats in you list.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
      • (Score: 4, Interesting) by art guerrilla on Friday June 23 2017, @01:20PM

        by art guerrilla (3082) on Friday June 23 2017, @01:20PM (#529996)

        yeah, i mean, never mind if the 'target' (defined as non-human, so, it's all good) killed was actually who they said, actually a 'bad guy' (YMMV), and actually a necessary thing (basically, is Empire a necessary thing?)...
        .
        but, yeah, real cool to kill another nekkid ape from a long ways aways, ultra-brave, too...

  • (Score: 3, Informative) by martyb on Friday June 23 2017, @03:50AM (14 children)

    by martyb (76) Subscriber Badge on Friday June 23 2017, @03:50AM (#529809) Journal

    This new record is the second time a Canadian has taken the record. It's a morbid record but quite a feat.

    According to this graphic [theglobeandmail.com], the top five longest kills are:

    • 3,540 m - Canada
    • 2,475 m - Britain
    • 2,430 m - Canada
    • 2,310 m - Canada
    • 2,300 m - USA

    To put that in different units, this record-breaking shot traveled two whole miles... and then continued... another one-thousand-feet!

    Or, to put it another way, it exceeded the prior record by over a kilometer!

    --
    Wit is intellect, dancing.
    • (Score: 3, Informative) by KGIII on Friday June 23 2017, @04:12AM (13 children)

      by KGIII (5261) on Friday June 23 2017, @04:12AM (#529822) Journal

      It's a feat. I qualified with the M16 at 500 yards. I hunt, so I am always finding excuses to go target practice. I am positive that I could not make shots at that distance.

      --
      "So long and thanks for all the fish."
      • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Friday June 23 2017, @10:46AM (12 children)

        Probably not but not all of the credit can go to the shooter. The spotter had to precisely calculate windage for 2.2 miles worth of changing winds, among other things, so he deserves some props as well.

        --
        My rights don't end where your fear begins.
        • (Score: 2) by Runaway1956 on Friday June 23 2017, @02:10PM (1 child)

          by Runaway1956 (2926) Subscriber Badge on Friday June 23 2017, @02:10PM (#530019) Journal

          Yeah - and how do you even DO that? So, the wind is blowing here, where you are, southerly, at about 5 mph. A quarter mile away, the wind is just eddying in the lee of a hill. A quarter mile further, the wind is southerly again, but 10 mph. Another quarter, and you have more eddies in the lee of a large building. The next quarter mile, wind is more south by southeast, at 10 mph. How in the FEK do you figure all of that, out past two miles? It seems like putting sensor up might attract the target's attention - maybe.

        • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 23 2017, @03:05PM (9 children)

          by Anonymous Coward on Friday June 23 2017, @03:05PM (#530037)

          Probably not but not all of the credit can go to the shooter. The spotter had to precisely calculate windage for 2.2 miles worth of changing winds, among other things, so he deserves some props as well.

          And luck. A lot of these things come down to luck.

          • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Friday June 23 2017, @05:30PM (8 children)

            Lack of bad luck, yeah. You don't get lucky on a 2.2 mile shot though. You either had that shit perfectly dialed in and the wind didn't change before you pulled the trigger or you just miss.

            --
            My rights don't end where your fear begins.
            • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Friday June 23 2017, @08:43PM (5 children)

              by bob_super (1357) on Friday June 23 2017, @08:43PM (#530224)

              Which is my question: Like the viral internet videos, how many shots did he take before he made it?

              • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Saturday June 24 2017, @12:34AM (4 children)

                One. You can't set up again before they hear the shot and start ducking for cover, even on a two mile away target.

                --
                My rights don't end where your fear begins.
                • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Saturday June 24 2017, @01:02AM (3 children)

                  by bob_super (1357) on Saturday June 24 2017, @01:02AM (#530358)

                  I'm not convinced that people in Iraq would identify a shot fired 2 miles away as being aimed at them.

                  The mention of high-rise tells me it's a city, or the edge of it. IF you can hear a muzzle blast from 2 miles away in a city, identify it as hostile from 2 miles away in a city, think that you might be within range when it's 2 miles away in a city, and think that you are potentially the target when there's another thousand targets in those 2 city miles, or even differentiate between the suppression fire that the closer enemies are filling the air with despite you being covered from their angle, then you'll duck.
                  And your buddy will kick your ass for being a coward no better than the infidels, for a painful humiliation that will last the whole 20 seconds before his chest explodes from one of the subsequent rounds.

                  I don't buy the "fire only when sure" in a war area when shooting far beyond normal range. I'm pretty sure your buddies closer to the target really want you to do your best asap, and keep trying until you don't miss.

                  • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Saturday June 24 2017, @08:30AM (2 children)

                    They probably would want you to but what they want and what you're trained to do are two extremely different things.

                    --
                    My rights don't end where your fear begins.
                    • (Score: 2) by bob_super on Monday June 26 2017, @04:18PM (1 child)

                      by bob_super (1357) on Monday June 26 2017, @04:18PM (#531370)

                      "John and Fred got killed because our sniper cover wasn't quite sure of his shot and didn't want to spook the bad guy too early"
                      Spooking the bad guys is how you win wars. The guy who saw the wall explode right next to his leg may thank his god, but still has to change his underwear and tell his friends that's not a safe place to be.

            • (Score: 2) by KGIII on Saturday June 24 2017, @01:33AM (1 child)

              by KGIII (5261) on Saturday June 24 2017, @01:33AM (#530372) Journal

              Squeeze, not pull.

              --
              "So long and thanks for all the fish."