Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by Fnord666 on Wednesday June 28 2017, @01:57AM   Printer-friendly
from the gotta-be-flexible dept.

IBM has a customer for its neuromorphic chips, and it is using terms like "neurons per rack" to describe the system's capabilities:

IBM and the U.S. Air Force Research Laboratory (AFRL) today announced they are collaborating on a first-of-a-kind brain-inspired supercomputing system powered by a 64-chip array of the IBM TrueNorth Neurosynaptic System. The scalable platform IBM is building for AFRL will feature an end-to-end software ecosystem designed to enable deep neural-network learning and information discovery. The system's advanced pattern recognition and sensory processing power will be the equivalent of 64 million neurons and 16 billion synapses, while the processor component will consume the energy equivalent of a dim light bulb – a mere 10 watts to power.

[...] The IBM TrueNorth Neurosynaptic System can efficiently convert data (such as images, video, audio and text) from multiple, distributed sensors into symbols in real time. AFRL will combine this "right-brain" perception capability of the system with the "left-brain" symbol processing capabilities of conventional computer systems. The large scale of the system will enable both "data parallelism" where multiple data sources can be run in parallel against the same neural network and "model parallelism" where independent neural networks form an ensemble that can be run in parallel on the same data.

"AFRL was the earliest adopter of TrueNorth for converting data into decisions," said Daniel S. Goddard, director, information directorate, U.S. Air Force Research Lab. "The new neurosynaptic system will be used to enable new computing capabilities important to AFRL's mission to explore, prototype and demonstrate high-impact, game-changing technologies that enable the Air Force and the nation to maintain its superior technical advantage."

Reprint and some more stuff.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 28 2017, @09:40AM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 28 2017, @09:40AM (#532344)

    So answer the question, FatPhil: did you get your mod points for the day, or is it just this one person you allege? This one person could be feeling all alone and in need of some comradeship!

  • (Score: -1, Troll) by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 28 2017, @10:03AM (2 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Wednesday June 28 2017, @10:03AM (#532347)

    Oh, and thank you for leaking even more about how much AC is not at all AC here on SoylentNews. Now I will have to go an wash my IP. But since you do know so much about this serial AC, and how things go on SoylentNews, what is the deal with mod points? Shadow banning? Alt-right Dark Enlightenment Censorship? Or did someone just reset UTC, again?

    • (Score: 2) by realDonaldTrump on Wednesday June 28 2017, @11:46PM

      by realDonaldTrump (6614) on Wednesday June 28 2017, @11:46PM (#532694) Homepage Journal

      The two things Dems love most are unmasking and surveillance. And OBSTRUCTIONISM. That's why you got unmasked. I don't know why they schlonged you on the Moderator Points, but I got some this afternoon. Everybody else is missing their Moderator Points, and I got my first ones. Even the Dems do the right thing, sometimes. It's good to be the President! #WINNING

    • (Score: 2) by FatPhil on Thursday June 29 2017, @03:53PM

      by FatPhil (863) <reversethis-{if.fdsa} {ta} {tnelyos-cp}> on Thursday June 29 2017, @03:53PM (#532980) Homepage
      I never noticed a time I was without mod points apart from after a particularly busy spell of modding, so RESOLVED/WORKSFORME.

      There's no need to snoop - you have such a distinctive style. Not just how you write an individual post, but how you cascade your conversations. I can usually tell an AC post by butthurt too (which does leak the fact that you're not butthurt), in fact I can probably identify 4 or 5 AC posters by style now.

      People having conversations with themselves that are not attempting to engage or illuminate the rest of the community do often fall under the remit of "Spam" moderation, so do not be surprised if someone does throw that grenade in your direction if you persist. Of course, inappropriate Spam moderation is an offence as bad as spam, so nobody should do that unless they are sure posts satisfy the criteria as listed in the FAQ up there ^--<--<--
      --
      Great minds discuss ideas; average minds discuss events; small minds discuss people; the smallest discuss themselves