Daniel Pocok blogs about the misguided picture that most people have over social media. These web sites turn out to be an effective means to monitor and control the population. One key point he makes is that the public ignores the ease with which social media, such as Facebook and Twitter, facilitate the effective kettling and surveillance of activists, campaigners, and other groups. He writes:
Facebook helps kettle activists in their arm chair. The police state can gather far more data about them, while their impact is even more muted than if they ventured out of their home.
And further down he asks,
Is somebody who takes pictures of you and insists on sharing them with hundreds of people, tagging your face for the benefit of biometric profiling systems, really a friend?
The addictive nature of these so-called services combined with the network effect make it really hard for people to escape, but the negative aspects really suggest that they should make the effort.
(Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 04 2017, @03:25AM
That would be a lot more impressive if it were demonstrably that public mass action movement that both demanded and extracted those concessions.
Instead, that particular goal has been on the public's radar since the days when Hillary Clinton first made "political correctness" a phrase in the public eye, and has been an incremental push ratcheted up by various academic consciousness-raisers since at least the '70s. It was well under way by the time that Occupy occupied anything.