Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by takyon on Tuesday July 04 2017, @05:04AM   Printer-friendly
from the news?-what-news? dept.

The World Socialist Web Site reports

In 1969, Hersh broke the story of the My Lai massacre in which US troops slaughtered over 100 Vietnamese men, women and children--a story the US media at first refused to touch. He was also among the first to expose the torture and sexual abuse of Iraqi prisoners by US soldiers at the Abu Ghraib prison in 2004. And he exposed the Obama administration's lies about the 2011 raid that killed Osama bin Laden, as well as the fabricated claims of a Syrian chemical weapons attack in 2013 that brought the US to the brink of another war.

[...] A full week has passed since the publication by a major German newspaper of Pulitzer Prize-winning journalist Seymour Hersh's thoroughgoing debunking of the false claim of a Syrian government chemical weapons attack on April 4. The supposed atrocity by the regime of Bashar al-Assad was used to justify the April 6 US cruise missile strike on the al-Shayat air base. At least nine civilians, including four children, died when 59 Tomahawk missiles rained down on the base in western Syria.

Since the German daily Die Welt published Hersh's article, titled "Trump's Red Line", on June 25, its contents have been subjected to a total blackout by the major newspapers and broadcast and cable news networks in the United States.

Hersh's account makes clear that, not only was there no objective evidence to back up Washington's charges of a chemical weapons attack by the Syrian government on the town of Khan Sheikhoun, the fact that there was no such attack was known to the US military and intelligence apparatus even before the cruise missile strike was ordered.

"The available intelligence made clear that the Syrians had targeted a jihadist meeting site on April 4 using a Russian-supplied guided bomb equipped with conventional explosives", Hersh wrote. "Details of the attack, including information on its so-called high-value targets, had been provided by the Russians days in advance to American and allied military officials in Doha, whose mission is to coordinate all US, allied, Syrian and Russian Air Force operations in the region."

Basing himself on sources within the US intelligence apparatus who spoke on condition of anonymity, as well as access to "transcripts of real-time communications, immediately following the Syrian attack on April 4", Hersh establishes that a Syrian government plane dropped a conventional 500-pound bomb, not a chemical weapon, on the site of the meeting, which included "representatives of Ahrar al-Sham and the al-Qaida-affiliated group formerly known as Jabhat al-Nusra".

The target was a cinder block building that served as a "command and control center" for the so-called "rebels", who used its basement to store "rockets, weapons, and ammunition", as well as chlorine, fertilizers and insecticides, Hersh reports.

"A Bomb Damage Assessment (BDA) by the US military later determined that the heat and force of the 500-pound Syrian bomb triggered a series of secondary explosions that could have generated a huge toxic cloud that began to spread over the town, formed by the release of the fertilizers, disinfectants and other goods stored in the basement, its effect magnified by the dense morning air, which trapped the fumes close to the ground", he continues.

"Did the Syrians plan the attack on Khan Sheikhoun? Absolutely", a senior adviser to US intelligence told Hersh. "Do we have intercepts to prove it? Absolutely. Did they plan to use sarin? No. But the president did not say: 'We have a problem and let's look into it.' He wanted to bomb the shit out of Syria."

[...] As the "mainstream" media has assumed the role of mouthpiece and stenographer for the capitalist state and its military and intelligence apparatus, its journalistic standards have continued to plummet, a tendency highlighted by last week's walkout by hundreds of New York Times workers in protest over the drive by the flagship of the capitalist press to "streamline" its editing process through the destruction of dozens of copy editors' jobs.

One result of the media's slavish subordination to the government and Wall Street has been the effective blacklisting of Hersh, who used to write regularly for the New Yorker magazine.


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 3, Funny) by The Mighty Buzzard on Tuesday July 04 2017, @10:34AM (10 children)

    Yeah, um, sorry. He's not privy to classified intel briefings. Or even non-classified briefings really. He heard it from a friend who heard it from a friend who heard it from another we've been messin' around.

    --
    My rights don't end where your fear begins.
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Moderation   +1  
       Troll=1, Funny=2, Total=3
    Extra 'Funny' Modifier   0  
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   3  
  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 04 2017, @12:55PM

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 04 2017, @12:55PM (#534782)

    Maybe. I wouldn't say his judgement (without all the information) is better or staking his reputation on the line means much to me, but journalists certainly shouldn't take governments at their word.

    He is, at least, asking the kind of questions that an investigative journalist should. Have those "privy to classified intel briefings" always told the truth?

  • (Score: 2) by realDonaldTrump on Tuesday July 04 2017, @03:30PM (4 children)

    by realDonaldTrump (6614) on Tuesday July 04 2017, @03:30PM (#534811) Homepage Journal

    Trust me, I pay O attention to FAKE briefings from the Lying CIA. I call it the Clinton Infiltration Agency. 🇺🇸

    • (Score: 1) by nnet on Tuesday July 04 2017, @04:50PM (3 children)

      by nnet (5716) on Tuesday July 04 2017, @04:50PM (#534833)

      Sad.

      • (Score: 2) by realDonaldTrump on Tuesday July 04 2017, @05:52PM (2 children)

        by realDonaldTrump (6614) on Tuesday July 04 2017, @05:52PM (#534855) Homepage Journal

        Nobody thought any politician would have the guts to approve that missile strike. And I just closed my eyes and said "do it." It's beautiful, it's great, everybody's happy, the sun is still shining, Assad's on his throne. Let me tell you, he was flying planes from the same airfield the day after my Tomahawk strike. The next day. When I approved it, I thought I’d take a lot of heat. But I took none, actually none. It's amazing. But I take so much heat for nonsense that it probably overrode the other. 🇺🇸

        • (Score: 3, Informative) by Ethanol-fueled on Tuesday July 04 2017, @07:28PM (1 child)

          by Ethanol-fueled (2792) on Tuesday July 04 2017, @07:28PM (#534896) Homepage

          Don't lie, you fired at was basically an empty complex and did it to shut up all those neocons barking up your ass. I'm a U.S. Army intel private third class in the NSA, we have your house bugged, and we have the tapes of you grumbling to yourself, "Fucking Jews, Nixon was right about every goddamn one of them!"

          Still, If you can out-Jew the Jews, kick out the illegals and halt the visa programs, then you win and get reelected.

          • (Score: 3, Touché) by bob_super on Thursday July 06 2017, @12:39AM

            by bob_super (1357) on Thursday July 06 2017, @12:39AM (#535476)

            > Still, If you can out-Jew the Jews, kick out the illegals and halt the visa programs, then you win and get reelected.

            Technically, to out-Jew the Jews, he'll need to invade Mexico, eject part of the population into Costa Rica, annex some of it, and colonize the rest progressively while making sure that everyone calls the Mexicans the aggressors and ask them for concessions when they complain. Then he can build himself The Longest Wall ever.
            Or do that to Canada.
            Or both.
            Since so many people seem to think that the Gitmo Gulag is par for the course, we might as well keep raising the bar...

  • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 04 2017, @06:37PM (3 children)

    by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 04 2017, @06:37PM (#534872)

    I find your faith disturbing.

    • (Score: 2) by The Mighty Buzzard on Tuesday July 04 2017, @08:11PM (2 children)

      Oh I don't have any particular bit of faith. I just think the guy is speaking without being in possession of the facts.

      --
      My rights don't end where your fear begins.
      • (Score: 0) by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 04 2017, @09:06PM (1 child)

        by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday July 04 2017, @09:06PM (#534933)

        Prof. Ted Postol has previously debunked the "effectiveness" of anti-missile Patriot missile batteries at destroying incoming warheads in the Middle East.
        (Zero were destroyed; all warheads launched by Iraq hit Allied territory and exploded on impact, most near their intended targets.)

        MIT Scientist FURTHER Debunks False Flag: "The Nerve Agent Attack that Did Not Occur" [zerohedge.com]
        By Theodore A. Postol, professor emeritus of science, technology, and national security policy at MIT

        Postol's main expertise is in ballistic missiles. He has a substantial background in air dispersal, including how toxic plumes move in the air. Postol has taught courses on weapons of mass destruction--including chemical and biological threats--at MIT.

        Before joining MIT, Postol worked as an analyst at the Office of Technology Assessment, as a science and policy adviser to the chief of naval operations, and as a researcher at Argonne National Laboratory. He also helped build a program at Stanford University to train mid-career scientists to study weapons technology in relation to defense and arms control policy.

        Postol is a highly-decorated scientist, receiving the Leo Szilard Prize from the American Physical Society, the Hilliard Roderick Prize from the American Association for the Advancement of Science, and the Richard L. Garwin Award from the Federation of American Scientists.

        .
        This analysis contains a detailed description of the times and locations of critical events in the alleged nerve agent attack of April 4, 2017 in Khan Shaykhun, Syria--assuming that the White House Intelligence Report (WHR) issued on April 11, 2017 correctly identified the alleged sarin release site.
        [...]
        the nerve agent attack described in the WHR did not occur as claimed. There may well have been mass casualties from some kind of poisoning event, but that event was not the one described by the WHR.

        -- OriginalOwner_ [soylentnews.org]