Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

posted by martyb on Tuesday July 04 2017, @01:04PM   Printer-friendly
from the it-all-adds-up dept.

Ada Lovelace (1815–1852) is celebrated as "the first programmer" for her remarkable 1843 paper which explained Charles Babbage's designs for a mechanical computer. New research reinforces the view that she was a gifted, perceptive and knowledgeable mathematician.

Christopher Hollings and Ursula Martin of Oxford Mathematics, and Adrian Rice, of Randolph-Macon College in Virginia, are the first historians of mathematics to investigate the extensive archives of the Lovelace-Byron family, held in Oxford's Bodleian Library. In two recent papers in the Journal of the British Society for the History of Mathematics and in Historia Mathematica they study Lovelace's childhood education, where her passion for mathematics was complemented by an interest in machinery and wide scientific reading; and her remarkable two-year "correspondence course" on calculus with the eminent mathematician Augustus De Morgan, who introduced her to cutting edge research on the nature of algebra.

[...] The papers, and the correspondence with De Morgan, can be read in full on the website of the Clay Mathematics Institute, who supported the work, as did the UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council.

[There apparently had been many claims that she lacked the background to have been able to produce the works attributed to her. These papers serve to show that she did, indeed, have the necessary background, curiosity, dedication, and gift for insights to have done so. -Ed.]

Source: University of Oxford Mathematical Institute


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 2) by Lagg on Tuesday July 04 2017, @02:36PM

    by Lagg (105) on Tuesday July 04 2017, @02:36PM (#534801) Homepage Journal

    I'm not surprised in the least that she was underplayed in that era. But is this shit people think now?

    Also this quote seems hilariously outdated for a 1990 paper. Had I not seen shit more ridiculous in the last 2 hours I might have a second thought:

    mad as a hatter … with the most amazing delusions about her own talents … the most overrated figure in the history of computing.

    I know that quote seems miney but I pasted it so deal with it I suppose. In any case, it's surrounded with a massive wall of quotes from people in the era both criticizing and complementing her. Like we see today. But of course I respect the eternal fight against revisionist history.

    --
    http://lagg.me [lagg.me] 🗿
    Starting Score:    1  point
    Karma-Bonus Modifier   +1  

    Total Score:   2