Stories
Slash Boxes
Comments

SoylentNews is people

SoylentNews is powered by your submissions, so send in your scoop. Only 10 submissions in the queue.
posted by takyon on Thursday July 06 2017, @03:51AM   Printer-friendly
from the a-hole-news dept.

From CNN's writeup on how they managed to "dox" an individual who posted a GIF of President Trump wrestling a CNN logo:

CNN is not publishing "HanA**holeSolo's" name because he is a private citizen who has issued an extensive statement of apology, showed his remorse by saying he has taken down all his offending posts, and because he said he is not going to repeat this ugly behavior on social media again. In addition, he said his statement could serve as an example to others not to do the same.

CNN reserves the right to publish his identity should any of that change.

For those that have not seen the GIF or video, it rose to prominence after this tweet by Trump. This story is being predictably split down partisan lines, but this raises major questions about freedoms in the internet age. This is a company which is part of one of world's largest and most powerful media conglomerates threatening to engage in an action knowing it would likely result in harm to an individual because they found a silly video clip about them distasteful.

To put this into perspective, imagine if an organization such as Fox News or Breitbart chose to track down and "dox" any of the countless individuals posting numerous anti-Trump memes. And they then threatened to publish this information unless said individual apologized and promised to stop posting memes. This may already be illegal under coercion laws in the US, but is time for the rights (or lack thereof) of anonymity and privacy in the digital world to be clearly codified?

takyon: A reporter for BuzzFeed, CNN reporter Andrew Kaczynski's former employer, compared the HanAssholeSolo GIF to the video tweeted by the President and found some differences, suggesting that it was altered by someone else before reaching the President or his aides (including the addition of a sound track). In other words, someone out there actually responsible for catching the President's attention may have gone unidentified, and the Reddit user likely uploaded only the initial version of the infamous GIF. The editing is acknowledged in the second paragraph of CNN's story.

Kaczynski has denied threatening anyone and says that the Reddit user called him and agreed that he had not been threatened by Kaczynski or CNN. He says that the "reserves the right to publish his identity" line from the CNN story has been misinterpreted, and that "It was intended only to mean we made no agreement w/the man about his identity". Kaczynski has also denied the widespread notion that the Reddit user was 15 years old, saying that "HanAssholeSolo is an adult and not 15 which people have spread".


Original Submission

 
This discussion has been archived. No new comments can be posted.
Display Options Threshold/Breakthrough Mark All as Read Mark All as Unread
The Fine Print: The following comments are owned by whoever posted them. We are not responsible for them in any way.
  • (Score: 1, Interesting) by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 06 2017, @07:27AM

    by Anonymous Coward on Thursday July 06 2017, @07:27AM (#535613)

    They've engaged in all sorts of arbitrary bans. This [theverge.com] is the story of how Martin Shkreli got banned for "harassment." What happened there was he apparently did little more than invite a far left reporter to Trump's inauguration and put in his bio that he had a crush on her. Trump's posts from a while back were being constantly brigaded by individuals posting memes with expletives, sexually driven imagery (Trump + Putin), etc. This was done by a fairly small number of accounts but extremely consistently and somehow almost immediately after Trump would post - each and every time. I can only assume Trump and his social media handlers felt the accounts would be eventually reprimanded and did nothing about it. Nothing ever happened. That is not considered harassment by Twitter. Kathy Griffin showing imagery of her holding Trump's decapitated and bleeding head on Twitter - nope, also not harassment. The only reason Trump's posts aren't to this day filled with spam and this sort of imagery (which is certainly offensive to many) is that he started blocking these accounts which led to claims of constitutional violations.

    I'm neither endorsing Trump/Shkreli/etc nor condemning those who oppose them. I'm just using this as an example of the biased nature of Twitter's censorship. And I would also emphasize that these are just the big names. Hundreds of thousands of people are banned for far more inane slights, but without a big name - they don't get the front page expose treatment of their cases even though they are in many cases certainly far more absurd.

    Free speech needs no "promoting and safeguarding." It is what it is. And it's not pretty. However, I think it's vastly better than the alternative.

    Starting Score:    0  points
    Moderation   +1  
       Interesting=1, Total=1
    Extra 'Interesting' Modifier   0  

    Total Score:   1